Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/19733/2026 of K SREENIVASULU Vs THE STATE OF AP on 20 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY, THE 21st DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 19733/2026 Between: K Sreenivasulu ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the

APHC010311222026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3460]

TUESDAY, THE 21st DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 19733/2026

Between:

K Sreenivasulu

...PETITIONER

AND

The State Of Ap and Others

...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. PAMARTHY RATHNAKAR

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES III

The Court made the following:

W.P.No.19733 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondents in not considering the representation of the Petitioner dated 29.04.2026 as illegal and arbitrary.

2. Initially, the Petitioner was selected as a Secondary Grade Teacher through DSC-2008 and has been discharging his duties ever since. While so, the Petitioner applied for the post of School Assistant (Mathematics) under Mega DSC-2025 and was selected for the said post. On selection, the Petitioner discharged his duties from 03.10.2025 to 28.11.2025.

3. On account of ill-health and subsequent demise of the mother of the Petitioner, the Petitioner suffered emotional trauma and had relinquished his appointment as School Assistant vide Letter and continued in the erstwhile post of S.G.T. After recovering from the trauma, the Petitioner submitted a representation to the Respondent Authorities to continue him as School Assistant (Mathematics) and stated that the letter of relinquishment was not given out of free will and but on account of emotional duress. As the said representation is not being considered, the present Writ Petition is filed.

4. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the representation of the Petitioner would be examined, an appropriate decision will be taken, and the same will be communicated to the Petitioner.

5. Heard the learned counsel.

6. Considering the submissions made and taking note of the fact that the Petitioner was selected as School Assistant (Mathematics) after a gruelling selection process under the Mega DSC-2025, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions:

i) The Respondents are directed to consider the representation of the Petitioner dated 29.04.2026 sympathetically and pass appropriate orders within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order, and communicate the same to the Petitioner.

ii) There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 21.07.2026 eha

WP No.19733 of 2026 Date: 21.07.2026

eha

U

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead