Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/12492/2016 of K.Eshwaramma, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 20 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE 21st DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12492/2016 Between: 1. K.ESHWARAMMA,, W/O.K.RAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. D.NO.10-2-64/1,

APHC010636802016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 21st DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 12492/2016

Between:

1. K.ESHWARAMMA,, W/O.K.RAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55

YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. D.NO.10-2-64/1, O.V.ROAD, KANDUKUR, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY,

MUNICIPAL

ADMINISTRATION

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.

2. THE

KANDUKUR

MUNICIPALITY,

KANDUKUR,

PRAKASHAM

DISTRICT REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner and trying to demolish the house property bearing D.No.10- 2-64/1, O.V. Road, Kandukur, Prakasham District and trying to install a statue in the land owned by the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of power, contrary to the well settled legal principles, apart from being violative of the fundamental and Constitutional Rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.2 not to interfere with the rights of the petitioner over the house property bearing D.No.10-2-64/1, O.V. Road, Kandukur, Prakasham District IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 15646 OF 2016

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 not to interfere with the rights of the petitioner over the house property bearing D.No.10-2-64/1, O.V. Road, Kandukur, Prakasham District, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SANJEEV GILLELA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP)

The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION No.12492 OF 2016

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition has outlived its purpose.

2. Recording the submission, the writ petition is closed. No costs.

3. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dt.21.07.2026 KGM

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION No.12492 OF 2016 Dated 21.07.2026

KGM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead