Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/12492/2016 of K.Eshwaramma, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 20 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE 21st DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12492/2016 Between: 1. K.ESHWARAMMA,, W/O.K.RAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. D.NO.10-2-64/1,
APHC010636802016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 21st DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 12492/2016
Between:
1. K.ESHWARAMMA,, W/O.K.RAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55
YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. D.NO.10-2-64/1, O.V.ROAD, KANDUKUR, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
MUNICIPAL
ADMINISTRATION
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.
2. THE
KANDUKUR
MUNICIPALITY,
KANDUKUR,
PRAKASHAM
DISTRICT REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner and trying to demolish the house property bearing D.No.10- 2-64/1, O.V. Road, Kandukur, Prakasham District and trying to install a statue in the land owned by the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of power, contrary to the well settled legal principles, apart from being violative of the fundamental and Constitutional Rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.2 not to interfere with the rights of the petitioner over the house property bearing D.No.10-2-64/1, O.V. Road, Kandukur, Prakasham District IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 15646 OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 not to interfere with the rights of the petitioner over the house property bearing D.No.10-2-64/1, O.V. Road, Kandukur, Prakasham District, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SANJEEV GILLELA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP)
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION No.12492 OF 2016
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition has outlived its purpose.
2. Recording the submission, the writ petition is closed. No costs.
3. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dt.21.07.2026 KGM
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION No.12492 OF 2016 Dated 21.07.2026
KGM