Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/3107/2026 of Bilas Bag Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 20 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE 21st DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 3107/2026 Between: 1. BILAS BAG, S/O. BHEEM BAG, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O. D.NO.
APHC010049832026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 21st DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 3107/2026
Between:
1. BILAS BAG, S/O. BHEEM BAG, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC.
BUSINESS R/O. D.NO. 32-4-20, PANDIT RAJU STREET, TANUKU, TANUKU
MANDAL, WEST
GODAVARI
DISTRICT
ANDHRA
PRADESH-534211
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
MUNICIPAL
ADMINISTRATION
DEPARTMENT,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522503
2. THE TANUKU MUNICIPALITY, TANUKU, WEST GODAVARI REP. BY
ITS COMMISSIONER-534211
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI
DISTRICT-534201
4. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICER, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT-534201
5. MAHANTI ESHWARA RAO, S/O. APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 52
YEARS OCC. BUSINESS, C/O. GANESH CATERING, PANDIT RAJU
STREET, TANUKU, TANUKU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
ANDHRA PRADESH-534211
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in
the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents nos. 2
to 4 in not taking necessary action against the 5th respondent for running business activity unauthorizedly in the name and style as Ganesh Catering at Pandit Raju Street, Tanuku, Tanuku Mandal, West Godavari District despite petitioners complaint Dt. 05-01-2026 made to the respondents as highly illegal, arbitrary and in violation of article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent nos. 2 to 4 to restrain the 5th respondent from running business activity unauthorizedly and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider petitioner’s compliant Dated:
05-01-2026 made by the petitioner and take appropriate action as per law pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. YASWANTH GADE
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. KARRE SATYANANDAM
2. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI SC For MUNICIPALITIES
3. GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW
4. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP
WRIT PETITION NO: 3107 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition is filed against the action of respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not taking necessary action against respondent No.5 for allegedly running an unauthorised business under the name and style "Ganesh Catering" at Pandit Raju Street, Tanuku, Tanuku Mandal, West Godavari District, despite the petitioner's complaint dated 05.01.2026.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed by the respondents and that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:21.7.2026 RSD
WRIT PETITION NO: 3107 of 2026 Date: 21.07.2026
RSD