Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/31093/2016 of Yerramestty Ganga Koteswara Vara Prasad, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 19 July 2026
Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010017172016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO:
HN, J
W.P.No.31093_2016
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement :
Date of uploading :
APHC010017172016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 31093/2016
Between:
1. YERRAMESTTY GANGA KOTESWARA VARA PRASAD,, S/O.
YARRAMSETTY NANDHIKESEWARARAO, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC:
BUSINESS, R/O.2-101, SAKIN, KOTTEVARI VEEDHI, SRI SATYASAI
STREET,
RAMVARAPPADU
VILLAGE,
VIJAYAWADA
RURAL
MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
2. NAGISETTY NARENDRA KUMAR,, S/O.ARJUNA RAO, AGED 36
YEARS,
OCC:
BUSINESS,
R/O.H.NO.2-101,
RAMVARAPPADU
RURAL, VIJAWAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS MUCICIPAL
ADMINISTRATION
&
URBAN
DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT,
A.P.SECRERETARIAT, HYDERABAD.
2. THE CIPITAL REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP.BY ITS
COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. A.P.
3. RAMVARAPPADU
GRAM
PANCHAYAT,
REP.BY
PANCHAYAT
SECRETARY,
RAMVARAPPADU,
VIJAYAWADA,
KRISHNA
DISTRICT.
4. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA
HN, J
W.P.No.31093_2016
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or orders or direction or a writ one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in trying to demolish highhandedly wihtout following due process of law and without issuance of notice to the peititioner, the house building as illegal, arbitrary and also in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the authorities not to demolish the house in an extent of 245.86 Sq.yards in R.S.
No.133/ 2E, D.No.24-23, Rarnavarappadu Village 85 Panchayat, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 38475 OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including demolition of the house building in an extent of 245.86 Sq.yards in R.S. No.133/2E, D.No.24-23, Ramavarappadu Village 456 Panchayat, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District, pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WVMP 2178 OF 2017
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in WPMP.No. 38475/2016 in WP.No.
31093/2016 dt. 14.09.2016 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. T B B KRISHNA MOHAN
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. A S C BOSE
2. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP)
3. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT)
4. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP)
HN, J
W.P.No.31093_2016
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The present writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents in trying to demolish the petitioners’ property without following due process of law and without issuing any notice to the petitioners.
2. This Court, vide order dated 14.09.2016 granted an interim stay as prayed for.
3. Recording the same, the present writ petition is disposed off in terms of the interim order granted earlier by this Court, with a further direction to the respondents not to demolish the petitioners’ property without following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:20.07.2026 NKA
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
HN, J
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 31093 of 2016 Date: 20.07.2026
NKA