Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/6619/2014 of Smt.B.A.Appala Narasmma d/o Simmaiah Vs Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation on 19 July 2026
ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MAIN CASE No. W.P.No.6619 of 2014 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 20.07.2026 BKM,J The writ petition is dismissed for default. (vide separate order) ______ BKM,J NNN
APHC010251212014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 6619/2014
Between:
1. SMT.B.A.APPALA NARASMMA D/O SIMMAIAH, E.NO.68096, OCCUPATION:
CONDUCTOR
R/O
FAKER
SHABEPETA,
PURUSHOTTAMPURAM
SARUBUJJILI
MANDAL,
ALAMAGEPETA POST SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. ANDHRA
PRADESH
STATE
ROAD
TRANSPORT
CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN &
MANAGING DIRECTOR MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD
2. ANDHRA
PRADESH
STATE
ROAD
TRANSPORT
CORPORATION,
SEC
REGION
SRIKAKULAM
REGION,
SRIKAKULAM REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER
3. THE DEPOT MANAGER, A.P.S.R.T.C., TEKKALI DEPOT, TEKKALI SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order direction or writ particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ (i) to set aside the Office
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
No.P4/876(1)/2012-RM-VZM dated 20.1.2012/24.1.2012 passed by the 2nd respondent directing petitioner to reinstate afresh without continuity of service and without back wages as illegal and arbitrary; (ii) and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service as conductor with continuity of service, back wages and other attendant benefits with all consequential benefits; (iii) and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 8206 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 16.10.2012 for regularization of his services as conductor in the respondent-Corporation and reinstate her into service with continuity of service with all consequential benefits including regularization and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K UDAYA SRI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K SRINIVASA PRASAD SC For APSRTC
The Court made the following Order:
No representation for the petitioner even after the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. On 23.06.2026 and 07.07.2026 also there was no representation for the petitioner.
2. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
20.07.2026 NNN