Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/18398/2026 of PALLEPOGU SIVAIAH Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 19 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3601] MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI WRIT PETITION NO: 18398/2026 Between: 1. PALLEPOGU SIVAIAH, S/O.

APHC010346042026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. PALLEPOGU SIVAIAH, S/O. GUNTAIAH, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC. WATCHMAN, R/O. DATTA KALYANA MANDAPAM, BEHIND AYYAPPASWAMY TEMPLE, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI.

2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF A.P., MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.

4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, JAGGAIAHPET CIRCLE, JAGGAIAHPET MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT.

5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHILLAKALLU P.S., CHILLAKALLU VILLAGE, JAGGAIAHPET MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondent No.4 and 5 to produce Mr. Mogilicherla Yesu Babu, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, R/o. S.C. Colony, Gajulapeta, Ibrahimpatnam, Vijayawada, NTR District, being my son- in law, who is in the custody of respondents, before this Hon'ble Court by declaring his detention to be illegal and arbitrary and release forthwith and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SIVA RAMA KRISHNA KOLLURU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following:

ORDER: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J)

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged detenu has been remanded to judicial custody by concerned Magistrate. In view thereof the petition may be dismissed as infructuous. He further submits that the petitioner would seek remedy of bail.

2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed.

No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J

_____________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI,J

Dated: 20.07.2026 AG

Dated: 20.07.2026 AG

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead