Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/310/2026 of C C BASHA Vs SRI P RAMU on 19 July 2026
reserved for orders : -- Date of pronouncement : 20.07.2026 Date of uploading : 20.07.2026 APHC010037302026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CONTEMPT CASE NO:
Date of reserved for orders : --
Date of pronouncement : 20.07.2026
Date of uploading : 20.07.2026
APHC010037302026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 310/2026
Between:
1. C C BASHA, S/O CHAPALI CHAN SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 50
YEARS, OCC DRIVER (E-412714), (UNDER REMOVAL
FROM
SERVICE)
OFFICE
OF
RAYACHOTY
DEPOT,
APSRTC, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT. R/O. RAYACHOTY.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI P RAMU, DISTRICT PUBLIC TRANSPORT OFFICER, APSRTC ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT AT RAYACHOTY.516269
2. SRI G MAHESWARA REDDY, DEPOT MANAGER, APSRTC, RAYACHOTY DEPOT, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.516269
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the respondents/
contemnors and punish them under Sections-10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, for willfully and deliberately violating the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 03.11.2025 passed in W.P.No.30000 of 2025
and pass such other orders.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC)
The Court made the following:
Whether the order is:
Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No
Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CONTEMPT CASE No.310 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The present Contempt Case is filed for non-compliance of the interim order dated 03.11.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.30000 of 2025, wherein this Court directed the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner as Driver and liberty was also given to them to initiate disciplinary action against the Petitioner for the alleged misconduct.
2. Taking note of the non-compliance of the said order, this Court on 06.05.2026 ordered for appearance of Respondent Nos.1 and 2 on 07.07.2026. On 07.07.2026, learned counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 informed this Court that vide Proceedings, dated 04.07.2026 issued by the District Public Transport Officer, APPTD, Annamayya District, Rayachoty, the Petitioner was reinstated into service. However, this Court observed that there is unnecessary delay in compliance of the orders till 07.07.2026. Learned counsel for the Respondents on instructions would submit that 50% of the salary is paid to the Petitioner from the date of interim order i.e., from 03.11.2025 till 07.07.2026.
3. In the light of the submissions made, as the interim order passed by this Court in W.P.No.30000 of 2025 is complied with, the Contempt Case is closed.
4. No order as to costs.
5. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J
Date: 20.07.2026
IS
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CONTEMPT CASE No.310 of 2026 Date: 20.07.2026
IS