Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/10584/2015 of V.Subbayamma C Surya Nirmala, w/o. Nageswara Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 19 July 2026
Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010745362015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO:
HN, J
W.P.No.10584_2015
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement :
Date of uploading :
APHC010745362015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 10584/2015
Between:
1. V.SUBBAYAMMA C SURYA NIRMALA, W/O. NAGESWARA RAO, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 3-1-480, 3-1-480/B & 3-1-481, BESIDE
KANKARAGUNTA BRIDGE, JUTE MILL ROAD, GUNTUR.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION
DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, A.P.SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2. THE
A
P
CAPITAL
REGION
DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY,
MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION ET URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, A. P SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN.
3. GUNTUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, GUNTUR.
4. THE
CITY
PLANNER
GUNTUR
MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION
GUNTUR, -
5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR GUNTUR GUNTUR DISTRICT, -
6. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/L A O GUNTUR GUNTUR
DIST, -
7. SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY REP BY ITS GENERAL, MANAGER, RAIL NILAYAM, SECUNDERABAD.
8. THE
DIVISIONAL
RAILWAY
OFFICER
DIVISIONAL
OFFICER
GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of MANDAMUS to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly
HN, J
W.P.No.10584_2015
one in nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents 3 &
4/their subordinates in demolishing a portion and further trying to demolish the shops/Residential premises of the petitioner with No:3-1-480, 3-1-40/B & 3-1- 481, situated at Kankaragunta Flyover, Jute Mill Road, Guntur, without following due process of law, notice or opportunity and under th colourable exercise of the power/extraneous considerations and as per their ; whims and fancies, as arbitrary, illegal, against principles of natural justice, contrary to orders in W.P.NO: 29085 of 2011 on 2-11-2011, and voilative of Art.300-A of constitution of India and consequently to retrain the respondents from 'demolishing any portion of the, , petitioner'S shops No:3-1-480, 3-1-40/B & 3- 1-481, situated at Kankaragunta Flyover, Jute Mill R ad, Guntur, without following due process of law/payment of just compensation, in the Interest of Justice IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 14000 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restrain the respondents 3 & 4 /their subordinates from demolishing any portion of the shops/ Residential premises of the petitioner with No. 3-1-480, 3-1-40/B & 3-1-481, situated at Kankaragunta Flyover, Jute Mill Road, Guntur, in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
IA NO: 4 OF 2015(WPMP 59464 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B SUDHAKAR REDDY AND NEERAJA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO
3. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP)
HN, J
W.P.No.10584_2015
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition, aggrieved by the proposed action of demolishing the shops/residential premises of the petitioner without following the due process of law.
2. This Court, vide order dated 13.04.201, granted stay of demolition of the petitioner’s property.
3. Sri A.S.C.Bose, learned Standing counsel for respondent No.3, submits that no further action could be taken in pursuance of the interim orders of this Court.
4. Recording the same, the present writ petition is disposed off, directing respondent No.3 to initiate appropriate action against the subject construction by issuing appropriate notices, calling for the petitioner’s explanation, and thereafter passing appropriate final orders. Till such exercise is completed, the respondent shall not disturb the possession and enjoyment of the subject property. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:20.07.2026 NKA
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
HN, J
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 10584 of 2015 Date: 20.07.2026
NKA