Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLA/3170/2018 of Madasu Chinna Kishta Rao @ Krishna Rao Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 19 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 20 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: Between: 1. MADASU CHINNA KISHTA RAO @ KRISHNA RAO, S/O SUBBARAO, AGED 68 YEARS, MALA, R/O NIDUMUKKALA VILLAGE,
APHC010931942018
IN THE H
(
MONDAY
THE HONOURA
THE HONOURAB
CRIMI
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. MADASU CHINNA KI AGED
YEARS, TADIKONDA MANDA
1. STATE OF ANDHRA Court of Judicature fo Pradesh
Appeal under Section Court may be pleased to to conviction and sentence p District, Guntur on 05.07.20 imprisonment for life and t imprisonment for two month IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section in the affidavit filed in suppo condone the delay of 98 da
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Y, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY BLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADA NAL APPEAL NO: 3170/2018 SHTA RAO @ KRISHNA RAO, S/O SU , MALA,
R/O NIDUMUKKALA L, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...AP AND A PRADESH, Rep. by its Public Prosec for the State of Telangana and State ...RESP 372/374(2)/378(4) of Cr.P.C praying th o prefer this Appeal having been aggrie passed by III Additional Sessions Jud 018 in S.C No. 26 of 2018, imposing pun to pay fine of rs.1,000/- in default unde hs under Section 302 IPC 151 CPC praying that in the circumstan ort of the petition, the High Court may be ays in preferring the Criminal Appeal
Y AM UBBARAO, VILLAGE, PPELLANT cutor High of Andhra PONDENT at the High eved by the dge, guntur nishment of ergo simple nces stated e pleased to
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. MARELLA RADHA
2. LEGAL AID Counsel for the Respondent:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice K.Suresh Reddy)
This Court, by order dt. 15.07.2026, directed the Superintendent, Central Prison, Rajamahendravaram to appear before this Court and explain as to why he has not taken action, as the appellant has not surrendered after the COVID period.
2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, states that right from 2023, the Superintendent, Central Prison, Rajamahendravaram has been addressing letters to the concerned Superintendent of Police. He also states that the Superintendent, Central Prison, Rajamahendravaram also addressed several letters to the appellant, but there was no response.
3. Today, the Superintendent, Central Prison, Rajamahendravaram is present before this Court and states that there are similarly situated persons who did not surrender before the Jail authorities after completion of COVID period.
4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor states that he will collect the details of all the convicts, who were not surrendered after the COVID period, and file appropriate petition before this Court within short time.
5. Be that as it may, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, states that the present appellant committed suicide on 13.05.2023, which was the subject matter of Cr.No.79/2023 of Tadikonda Police Station.
In view of the above statement, this Criminal Appeal is dismissed as abated.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. __________________ K.SURESH REDDY, J
____________________ SUMATHI JAGADAM, J 20.07.2026 MVA