CMA/384/2026 of Bharat Petroleunn Corporation Limited Vs Jonnalagadda Venkata Naga Padmaja on 19 July 2026

APHC010349812026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 384/2026

Between:

1. BHARAT

PETROLEUNN

CORPORATION

LIMITED,

BHARAT

PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED,REPRESENTED BY ITS

TERRITORY MANAGER RETAIL,KONDAPALLI DEPOT FORMERLY

TERRITORY OFFICE,REPRESENTED BY TERRITORY MANAGER

RETAIL, NELLORE KONDAPALLI DEPOT, PENAPAAKA VILLAGE

POST,VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRI

...APPELLANT

AND

1. JONNALAGADDA

VENKATA

NAGA

PADMAJA,

W/O.

RAMACHANDRA

MURTHY,AGED

ABOUT

YEARS,

R/O.

HYDERABAD,TEMPORARILY

RESIDING

AT

D.NO.24-1-29,OLD

GOVT. HOSPITAL ROAD, ONGOLE TOWN,PRAKASAM DISTRICT, PIN 523001.

2. NAVULURI VENKATA RAVI PRASAD, S/O. VENKATA RAMANA

MURTHY LATE,AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, HINDU,R/O. COLUMBUS

CITY, OHIO STATE, U.S.A.,TEMPORARILY RESIDING AT D.NO.24-1- 29,NEAR

OLD

GOVT.

HOSPITAL

ROAD,

ONGOLE

TOWN

PRAKASAM DISTRICT, PIN 523001.

3. BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED, INCORPORATED

UNDER

THE

INDIAN

COMPANIES

ACT,

1913,HAVING

ITS

REGISTERED OFFICE AT BHARAT BHAVAN 4 AND 6,CURRIM BHAI

ROAD, BALLARD ESTATE, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA STATE, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRE

4. THE

DIRECTOR

MARKETING

BHARAT

PETROLEUM

CORPORATION LIMITED, BHARAT BHAVAN, 4 AND 6, CURRIM

BHAI ROAD,BALLARD ESTATE, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA STATE, 400001

5. THE

CHIEF

VIGILANCE

OFFICER,

BHARAT

PETROLEUM

CORPORATION LIMITED,BHARAT BHAVAN, 4 AND 6, CURRIM BHAI

ROAD,BALLARD

ESTATE,

MUMBAI,

MAHARASHTRA

STATE,

400001

6. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RETAIL, BHARAT PETROLEUM

CORPORATION LIMITED,MARKET TOWERS, EF, 12TH FLOOR, CUFFEE PARADE MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA STATE, 400005.

RESPONDENTS 3 TO 6 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES IN THIS

APPEAL

...RESPONDENT(S):

Appeal Under Section_____against orderspleased to allow this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and set aside the Order and Decree dated 07.04.2026

passed in I.A. No. 51 of 2026 in O.S. No. 6 of 2026 on the file of the Ill- Additional District Judge (FTC), Ongole and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay the Impugned order & decree passed in I.A 51 of 2026 in OS.

06 of 2026 dated 07.04.2026 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Ongole, pending disposal of the present Civil Miscellaneous Application and pass Counsel for the Appellant:

1. S.V.S.S.SIVA RAM

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI

The Court made the following:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AT AMARAVATI

JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh)

The present appeal is filed aggrieved by the order passed by the learned III Additional District Judge (FTC), Ongole, in I.A.No.51 of 2026 in O.S.No.6 of 2026, filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 94 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

2.

After filing the present appeal, the learned counsel for the appellant brought to the notice of this Court that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the lease has been extended. The said compromise has been recorded by the trial Court in I.A. No.697 of 2026. By virtue of the said compromise, the appellants have been permitted to proceed with the lease in terms of the compromise. In view of the subsequent developments, the parties are no longer interested in prosecuting the present appeal.

3.

Recording the said submission, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Appeal shall stand closed.

____________

D.RAMESH, J

____________________

ALAPATI GIRIDHAR, J

Dated : 20.07.2026

TJN

Dated: 20.07.2026

TJN

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AT AMARAVATI

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 384 OF 2026

PROCEEDING SHEET

SL.

NO.

DATE