Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/19718/2026 of B DILLESWARA RAO Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 19 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE 20 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 19718/2026 Between: 1. B DILLESWARA RAO, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O HARIJAN STREET, SC COLONY, CB ROAD VILLAGE SECRETARIAT, OLD SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH,
APHC010243622026
IN TH
MOND
THE HONOURA
WR
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. B DILLESWARA RA OCC. BUSINESS, VILLAGE SECRET DISTRICT.
1. THE STATE OF AN SECRETARY, D SECRETARIAT, VE
2. THE DISTRICT SRIKAKULAM-5320
3. THE DISTRICT PRO SRIKAKULAM DIST
4. THE STATION H SRIKAKULAM-5320
5. MADHU BAR AN PROPRIETOR, S PONNADA BRIDGE 532001. Petition under Articl circumstances stated in E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) DAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL RIT PETITION NO: 19718/2026 AO, S/O MOHAN RAO, AGED ABO R/O HARIJAN STREET, SC COLON TARIAT, OLD SRIKAKULAM, AND NDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED B EPARTMENT OF PROHIBITION A ELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-225 COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DIS 001, OHIBITION AND EXCISE OFFICER, TRICT-532001. OUSE OFFICER, I TOWN POLIC
001. ND RESTAURANT WINE SHOP, SRI MADHU ,0PP. SEETHARAM E, OLD SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULA ...RES le 226 of the Constitution of India pra the affidavit filed therewith, the High DESH
LAPATI UT 35 YEARS, NY, CB ROAD SRIKAKULAM ...PETITIONER BY PRINCIPAL AND EXCISE,
503. STRICT, AT SRIKAKULAM, CE STATION, REP BY ITS MA TEMPLE, AM DISTRICT- SPONDENT(S): aying that in the h Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not initiating action on shifting of the 5th respondent A4 license shop situated violating Rules laid down in G.O.Ms.No.210 Revenue (Excise) Department dated 30-09-2024. as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of The Andhra Pradesh Excise Act apart from being violative of rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to exercise the powers under Section 53-A of The Andhra Pradesh Excise Act and be pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to shift the 5th respondent A4 license shop in the interest of justice and be pleased to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRAVAN KUMAR NAIDANA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE
2. GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following order:
Sri Sravan Kumar Naidana, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that certain mistakes have crept in the Writ Petition and sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition. Permission, as sought for, is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh Writ Petition. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 20.07.2026 MP
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION No.19718 OF 2026 Dated : 20.07.2026
MP