Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/35441/2013 of Chintada Kurmayya, S/o. Late Suryanarayana Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh on 19 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010367702013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO:

HN, J

W.P.No.35441_2013

Date of reserved for orders :

Date of pronouncement :

Date of uploading :

APHC010367702013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 35441/2013

Between:

1. CHINTADA KURMAYYA, S/O. LATE SURYANARAYANA, R/O. 14-11- 21/4, BHANOJITHOTA, OPP.

DEFENCE

COLONY

GATE,

GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS

PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY,

REVENUE

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM.

3. THE

TAHSILDAR,

GAJUWAKA

MANDAL,

GAJUWAKA,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

4. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VISAKHAPATNAM.

5. THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER, THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, GAJUWAKA ZONE, VISAKHAPATNAM.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature

HN, J

W.P.No.35441_2013

of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in trying to demolish the hut and dispossess the petitioner from the land bearing Door No.14-11-21/4 of Bhanoji Thota, B.C.Road, Gajuwaka Village within Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation Visakhapatnam, without issuing any notice or passing any orders and as arbitrary, illegal, improper and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent herein not to demolish the hut and disposes the petitioner from the land bearing Door No.14-11-21/4 of Bhanoji Thota, B.C.Road, Gajuwaka Village within Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation Visakhapatnam, without issuing any notice or passing any orders and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 44046 OF 2013

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to demolish the hut and disposses the petitioner from the land bearing DOOR No.14-11-21/4 of Bhanoji Thota, B.C.Road, Gajuwaka Village within Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. V V N NARASIMHAM

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY(SC FOR GVMC)

2. GP FOR REVENUE

HN, J

W.P.No.35441_2013

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The petitioner was granted a patta in respect of the residential plot and has been in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same.

2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioner from the said land by demolishing the existing structure, without following the due process of law. Copies of the patta certificate and the Pattadar Pass Book have also been filed along with the writ petition.

3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. However, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the present writ petition can be disposed off by directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property without following the due process of law. This direction shall, however, be subject to the condition that the respondents have not already taken any action in that regard prior to the passing of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:20.07.2026 NKA

Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

HN, J

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 35441 of 2013 Date: 20.07.2026

NKA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead