Andhra Pradesh High Court
SA/595/2005 of Bodi Malleswari, Vs Bodi Veera Swamy on 19 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 595/2005 Between: 1. BODI MALLESWARI,, D/O. LATESURYANARAYANA R/O. DOOR
APHC010378262005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3397]
MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI
GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 595/2005
Between:
1. BODI MALLESWARI,, D/O. LATESURYANARAYANA R/O.
DOOR .NO.4-9-48, 4TH LANE, NAYUDUPET, GUNTUR-2.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. BODI VEERA SWAMY, S/O. LATE SURYANARAYANA
R/O
BY
THE
SIDE
OF
ANNADANA
SATRAM,
AMARAVATHI ROAD, GUNTUR-2.
2. BODI RANGA RAO, S/O. LATE SURYANARAYANA RAO
R/O. D.NO.4-9-48, 4TH LANE, NAYUDUPET, GUNTUR.
3. BODI VENKATESWARLU, S/O. LATE SURYANARAYANA
RAO
R/O.
D.NO.4-9-48,
4TH
LANE,
NAYUDUPET,
GUNTUR.
4. BODI SREENIVASA RAO, S/O. LATE SURYANARAYANA
RAO
R/O.
D.NO.4-9-48,
4TH
LANE,
NAYUDUPET,
GUNTUR.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal under section ___________ against orders
petition, the High Court may be pleased pass the interim orders restraining the respondents/defendants from interering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the appellant/plaintiff in respect ofsuit schedule property, pending disposal of Second Appeal petition, the High Court may be pleased
petition, the High Court may be pleased
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. P SAI SURYA TEJA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI
GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 595/2005
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:-
Learned counsel on both sides is present.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo vide USR No.77170 of 2026 before the Registry seeking withdrawal of the Second Appeal and the same is placed on record.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Second Appeal.
4. Permission is accorded.
5. Considering the said memo, the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim Order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________________ JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 20.07.2026 LSP