Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMSA/7/2016 of Perni Raghavaiah Vs Prathipati Rangamma on 19 July 2026
for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010671742016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 20 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO: 6/2016 Between: Perni Raghavaiah Yarlagadd Ramulu and
Date of reserved for orders
:
Date of pronouncement
:
Date of uploading
:
APHC010671742016
IN THE H
(
MONDAY
THE HONOURAB
CIVIL MISCELL
Between:
Perni Raghavaiah
Yarlagadd Ramulu and Others
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.SUBBA RAO KORRAPA
Counsel for the Responden
1.MARRI VENKATA RAM
2.SRICHARAN TELAPRO
CIVIL MISCELL
Between:
Perni Raghavaiah
Prathipati Rangamma and Oth
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.SUBBA RAO KORRAPA
Counsel for the Responden
1.MARRI VENKATA RAM
2.SRICHARAN TELAPRO
The Court made the followin
------
20.07.2026
24.07.2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
Y, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
BLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALL
LANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO: 6/2016
...A
AND
s
...RESPO
ATI
t(S):
ANA
OLU
LANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO: 7/2016
...A
AND
hers
...RESPO
ATI
t(S):
ANA
OLU
ng:
LI
APPELLANT
ONDENT(S)
APPELLANT
ONDENT(S)
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NOs: 6 and 7 of 2016
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON JUDGMENT:
1. These C.M.S.A.Nos.6 and 7 of 2026, filed under Section 75 of the Provincial Insolvency Act, are preferred by the appellant-respondent against the judgments dated 28.01.2016 passed in A.S.Nos.57 and 59 of 2014, respectively, by the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-VIII Additional District Judge, Ongole.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the sole appellant in both the appeals died during the pendency of the proceedings. He further submits that, though efforts were made to inform the relatives of the deceased appellant regarding the pendency of the appeals and the necessity to take appropriate steps, they have not come forward to file necessary applications for bringing the legal representatives of the deceased appellant on record.
3. In view of the above submission, this Court is of the considered view that, in the absence of any steps being taken by the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant to come on record and prosecute the appeals, the appeals stand abated.
4. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeals are dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs.
Interim orders, if any, granted earlier shall stand vacated, and all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 20.07.2026 SAK Whether the Judgments are: Speaking Yes/ Reasoned No Reportable No / Non-Reportable Yes
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NOs: 6 and 7 of 2016
Date: 20.07.2026
SAK