Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/6690/2023 of CH CHINNA GALAIAH Vs SRI G PALA RAJU IPS on 16 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3523] FRIDAY, THE 17th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6690/2023 Between: 1. CH CHINNA GALAIAH, S/O.GALAIAH AGED 51

APHC010635702023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE 17th DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6690/2023

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. CH CHINNA GALAIAH, S/O.GALAIAH AGED 51 YEARS,ARPC 2773(UNDER DISMISSAL) DAR GUNTUR, R/O.GUNTUR DISTRICT- 52201 CELL NO 9701916297)

...PETITIONER AND

1. SRI G PALA RAJU IPS, THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE GUNTUR RANGE,GUNTUR.

2. SRI Y RAVI SANKAR REDDY IPS, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE PALNADU DISTRICT NARASAROPET (EARLIER GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT )

3. SRI SARVASHREHSTH TRIPATHI IPS, THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE GUNTUR RANGE GUNTUR

4. SRI K SRINIVASA RAO IPS, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE PALNADU DISTRICT NARASARAOPET

EARLIER GUNTUR GUNTUR DISTRICT RR3 AND 4 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 28 03 2025 VIDE I A NO 1 OF 2024 IN C C NO 6690 OF 2023

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K R SRINIVAS Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. G RAJU

2. .

3. Contempt Case No:6690 of 2023 The Court made the following Order:

Ms. G Manasa, learned counsel, represented learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. At the time of considering the matter, Mr. G Raju, learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4, submits that vide Proceedings in DO.No.690/2026 dated 01.07.2026, petitioner was reinstated into service with all consequential benefits. In view of the same, nothing survives for adjudication in the contempt case and the same may be closed.

3. Recording the submissions made, this Contempt Case is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

_________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:17.07.2026 Ksj

Contempt Case No:6690 of 2023 17th July, 2026

Ksj

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead