Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/950/2026 of MOLLI APPALARAJU Vs SHRI KETAN GARG IAS on 16 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 17th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 950/2026 Between: 1. MOLLI APPALARAJU, S/O. RAMU NAIDU, AGED 62 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.12-451/02, ARILOVA SECTOR-I, DAIRY FARM
APHC010091332026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 17th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 950/2026
Between:
1. MOLLI APPALARAJU, S/O. RAMU NAIDU, AGED 62 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.12-451/02, ARILOVA SECTOR-I, DAIRY FARM (POST), VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
2. MOLLI JAGGA RAO, S/O. RAMU NAIDU, AGED 58 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.12-451/02, ARILOVA SECTOR-I, DAIRY FARM (POST), VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
3. LATE MOLLI APPARAO, S/O. KANNAYYA, REPRESENTED BY HIS
WIFE SMT. MOLLI PYDITHALLI W/O LATE MOLLI APPARAO, AGED
70 YEARS RIO. THOTAGARUVU, ARILOVA SECTOR-I DAIRY FARM
(POST), VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
4. MOLLI APPALANARASAMMA, AGED 70 YEARS, W/O. LATE
RAMANNA, R/O.D.NO.8-1/1 THOTAGARUVU, ARILOVA SECTOR-I, DAIRY FARM (POST), VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
5. MOLLI
APPALARAJU,
S/O.
VENKAPPA,
AGED
YEARS,
R/O.D.NO.8-1/1 THOTAGARUVU, ARILOVA SECTOR-I, DAIRY FARM
(POST), VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. SHRI KETAN GARG IAS, Age 37 years, s/o Dr. Ramachandra Naidu Galla, Commissioner, The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation Visakhapatnam
...CONTEMNOR
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondent-1/Contemner under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of courts Act, for his willful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 06-08-2025 passed in W.P.No.14814 of 2024 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. B.UMA MAHESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP)
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.950 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P. No.14814 of 2024, dated 06.08.2025, has been complied with by passing an order rejecting the petitioners' claim for compensation or Transferable Development Rights. Therefore, no further orders are necessary in the present Contempt Case.
2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.
3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. It is left open for the petitioners to take further steps in pursuance of the orders passed by the respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:17.07.2026 KGM
Whether the order is: Speaking
Reasoned ☑ Reportable
Non-reportable ☑
CONTEMPT CASE No.950 of 2026 Date: 17.07.2026
KGM