Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1805/2026 of VADDE RAJENDRA Vs M HARI NARAYANA IAS on 16 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 17th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1805/2026 Between: 1. VADDE RAJENDRA, S/O HANUMANNA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O D.NO.3/141, UPPARAVIDHI,
APHC010227992026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 17th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1805/2026
Between:
1. VADDE RAJENDRA, S/O HANUMANNA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC
CONTRACTOR,
R/O
D.NO.3/141,
UPPARAVIDHI,
YEMIGNUR,KURNOOL-518360.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. M HARI NARAYANA IAS, THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF
MUNICIPAL
ADMINISTRATION,
SRI
KRISHNA
ENCLAVE,
GORANTIA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SHRI SIVA PRASAD IFS, MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P. STATE
HOUSING CORPORATION LTD, 2ND FLOOR SP RIVER VIEW
BUILDING, TADEPALLI, AMARAVATI,
3. SRI N GANGI REDDY, COMMISSIONER, THE YAMIGNUR
MUNICIPALITY, YAMIGNUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents U/s. 10 to 12 of contempts of Court Acts for willful and deliberate violation of Final order passed in WP
No. 27356 /2025 dated 08.10.2025 by Learned Single Judge and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KOMMA VIJAYA RAJ KUMAR
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. GUDAPATI LAKSHMI NARAYANA
2.
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.1805 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.27356 of 2025, dated 08.10.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.
3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:17.07.2026 KGM
Whether the order is: Speaking
Reasoned ☑ Reportable
Non-reportable ☑
CONTEMPT CASE No.1805 of 2026 Date: 17.07.2026
KGM