Andhra Pradesh High Court
SA/428/2009 of Pishadapu Sambasiva Rao Vs Pushadapu Seetha Maha Lakshmi @ Seethamma on 15 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] THURSDAY, THE 16th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 428/2009 Between: 1. PISHADAPU SAMBASIVA RAO, S/O.VENKATEWARLU, HINDU
APHC010472222009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3397]
THURSDAY, THE 16th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI
GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 428/2009
Between:
1. PISHADAPU SAMBASIVA RAO, S/O.VENKATEWARLU, HINDU EMPLOYEE R/O.CHEERUKUPALLI VILLAGE &
MANDAL, REPALLE, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. PUSHADAPU SEETHA MAHA LAKSHMI SEETHAMMA, W/O.SUBRAHMANYAM.
HINDU
R/O.PUSHADAPUVARIPALEM,
H/O.AREPALLI,
CHEERUKUPALLI
MANDAL,
REPALLE,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
2. MATTI VENKATA LAKSHMI, W/O.NAGAMALLESWARA
RAO R/O.NAGARAM VILLAGE & MANDAL, REPALLE,
3. MATTI SRI HARI, W/O.LAKSHMINARAYANA, HINDU
R/O.NAGARAM
VILLAGE
&
MANDAL,
REPALLE,
GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. PUSHADAPU SEETHARAVAMMA, W/O.TATAIAH, HINDU
R/O.ATCHUTHAPURAM,
NIMPATNAM
MANDAL,
REPALLE, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
5. NALLAPATI
VIJAYALAKSHMI,
W/O.TATAIAH,
HINDU
R/O.ATCHUTHAPURAM,
NIMPATNAM
MANDAL,
REPALLE, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
6. PUSHADAPU
RAMA
RAO,
S/O.TATAIAH,
HINDU
R/O.ATCHUTHAPURAM,
NIMPATNAM
MANDAL,
REPALLE, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
7. PUSHADAPU KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O.TATAIAH, HINDU
PET
TADEVARTHI
BAPAIAH
HIGH
SCHOOL
R/O.DHULIPUDI,
NAGARAM
MANDAL,
REPALLE,
8. PUSHADAPU BHASKARA RAO, S/O.TATAIAH, HINDU
CULTIVATION
R/O.PUSHADAPUVARIPALEM,
CHERUKUPALLI
MANDAL,
REPALLE,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal under section ___________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2009(SAMP 826 OF 2009
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 89 days in representing the appeal SASR.No. 52991/2008
IA NO: 2 OF 2009(SAMP 982 OF 2009
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased expedite hearing opf the SA at an early date in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2011(SAMP 621 OF 2011
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to order stay of all further proceedings in OS.No. 168/2008 on the file of the Repalli pending disposal of the SA
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the present Second Appeal in SA No.
428 of 2009 with a liberty to prosecute freshly instituted comprehensive suit in OS No. 14 of 2014 on the file of the court of Learned Senior Civil Judge at Repalle, in the interests of justice and pass Counsel for the Appellant:
1. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V V L N SARMA
2. SAMBA SIVA RAO KONDAPALLI
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI
GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 428/2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:-
Mrs.Nimmagadda Revathi, learned counsel appearing Mr.Nimmagadda Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the appellant is present.
2. Pursuant to the letter addressed by the learned counsel for the appellant on 14.07.2026 to the Registry (Judicial), the matter is listed today under the caption “For Withdrawal”. The letter is placed on record.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present second appeal.
4. Permission is accorded.
5. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim Order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________________ JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 16.07.2026 LSP