Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRP/357/2021 of SURYANARAYANA Vs GORAVA SHIVAMMA on 15 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY, THE 16th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 357/2021 Between: 1. SURYANARAYANA, S / O PENUMURTI MUNEYYA AGED ABOUT 59YRS, R/O KUMBALANURU 2ND CAMP

APHC010114662021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 16th DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 357/2021

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SURYANARAYANA, S / O PENUMURTI MUNEYYA AGED ABOUT 59YRS, R/O KUMBALANURU 2ND CAMP NADICHAGI POST, KOWTHALAM MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT

...PETITIONER AND

1. GORAVA SHIVAMMA, W/O LATE GORAVA MAHADEVA AGED ABOUT 38YRS . R/O H.NO.27/ 145, KUMBALANURU VILLAGE KOWTHALAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT

2. MINOR MALLAMMA, D/O LATE GORAVA MAHADEVA AGED ABOUT 18YRS, OCC. STUDENT R/O H.NO.27/ 145, KUMBALANURU VILLAGE KOWTHALAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT

3. MINOR HARNPAMMA, D/O LATE GORAVA MAHADEVA AGED ABOUT 14YRS, OCC. STLIDENT R/O H.NO.27/ 145, KUMBALANURU VILLAGE KOWTHALAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toAggrieved by the order and decree in CMA No.19/2016, dt.08-02- 2021 on the file of the .II Additional District Judge, Kurnool at Adoni reversing the orders in I.A.No.50/2016 in O.S.No.12/2016, dt.07-04-2016 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Adoni, IA NO: 1 OF 2021

BKM,J C.R.P.No.357 of 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order. and decree in CMA No.19/2016, dt.08-02- 2021 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Kurnool at Adoni pending disposal of the CRP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. B SARVOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. K RAJANNA

BKM,J C.R.P.No.357 of 2021

The Court made the following Order:

No representation for the petitioner, inspite of posting the matter under the caption “for dismissal”.

2. On earlier occasion also i.e., on 02.07.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner.

3. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN

16.07.2026 PGT

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead