Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/35370/2025 of ULLANGI KAMESWARAMMA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 15 July 2026
for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010690792025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3601] THURSDAY, THE 16th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement :
Date of uploading :
APHC010690792025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 16th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. ULLANGI KAMESWARAMMA, W/O. PRAKASH RAO, AGED 36 YEARS, R/O, ALAGAM, LUWASINGI, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVEMMENTFAC, REVENUE(EXCISE-II) DEPARTMENT,
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
5. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAMDISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue writ order or direction more articularly one in the nature of writ of Habeas Corpus under Article 226 of the constitution of India directing the 4 respondent to produce Ullangi Prakash Rao S/o. Simhachalam, who is now detained in Central Prison, Visakhapatnam before this Honble Court and he may be ordered to be released forthwith after declaring his detention vide G.0.RT.N0.581, dt. 13.06.2025, passed by the 2nd respondent which was confirmed by the respondent vide G.O.Rt.No. 930, dt.26.08.2025 Revenue(Excise-II) Dept., as illegal and un constitutional and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following:
ORDER: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J)
Sri I. Prakash, learned counsel representing Sri D. Purna Chandra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the period of detention under the impugned order has already completed and consequently, the petition has been rendered infructuous and the petition be dismissed as infructuous.
2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J
_____________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI,J
Dated: 16.07.2026 AG
Dated: 16.07.2026 AG