Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/11510/2025 of B NAGAPPA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 15 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY, THE 16th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 11510/2025 Between: 1. B NAGAPPA, S/O HANUMAYYA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC OFFICE SUBORDINATE (SUPERANNUATED), R/O

APHC010230042025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 16th DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 11510/2025

Between:

1. B NAGAPPA, S/O HANUMAYYA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC

OFFICE SUBORDINATE (SUPERANNUATED), R/O D.NO. 1- 300B, PULAMATHI VILLAGE, LEPAKSHI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR

DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT

AND

TRAINING,

SECRETARIAT,

AMARAVATHI,

GUNTUR

DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND THE CHARIMAN SURPLUS

MANPOWER

CELL

SMPC,

,

ANANTAPUR,

ANANTAPUR

DISTRICT

3. THE

DISTRICT

EMPLOYMENT

OFFICER,

DISTRICT

EMPLOYMENT

EXCHANGE

OFFICE,

ANANTAPUR,

ANANTAPUR DISTRICT

4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND CO-OPERATION

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT,

AMARAVATHI,

GUNTUR

DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH

5. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE COOPERATIVE RURAL

IRRIGATION CORPORATION APSCRIC, H.NO. 52-113-414C,

ROAD NO.1B, NTR COLONY, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT

REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR/MANAGING DIRECTOR

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issuance of an appropriate Writ.

Order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring that action of the 3rd respondent in issuing impugned proceedings vide No.A6/DEE/ATP/Establishment/2025 dated 31.03.2025 retiring the petitioner from his services on attaining the age of superannuation of 60 years as bad, illegal, arbitrary and contrary to G.O.Ms.No.15, Finance (HR.IV-FR and LR) Department, dated 31.01.2022 and also contrary the principles of natural justice apart from being violative of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Articles 14,16

and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently declare that the petitioner is entitled to be continued in service upto the age of 62 (Sixty Two) years in terms of G.O.Ms.No.15, Finance (HR.IV-FR and LR)

Department, dated 31.01.2022 with all consequential monetary and service benefits and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to reinstate and continue the services of the petitioners till they attain the age of 62 years by suspending the operation of the impugned proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent vide No.A6/DEE/ATP/Establishment/2025

dated

31.03.2025, pending disposal of the present writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. M VENKATA SAI NIKHIL KASHYAP

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.

The Court made the following:

WRIT PETITION No.11510 of 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of Respondents in not enhancing the age of superannuation of the Petitioner from 60 years to 62 years, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner had submitted that the State Government had recently issued G.O.Ms.No.45, (Finance (HR.IV- FR&LR) Department), dated 02.07.2026 according approval for enhancement of age of superannuation from 60 to 62 years for regular employees of PSUs, Corporations and Societies included under Schedules IX and X of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganization Act-2014 retrospectively with effect from 01-01-2022.

3. In view of the implementation of the aforesaid G.O, no further orders are required to be passed and this Writ Petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the Petitioner to question the entitlement for his salary and retirement benefits in independent proceedings.

4. No order as to costs.

5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

Date: 16.07.2026 chs Whether the order is: Speaking ✔ Reasoned

Reportable

Non-reportable ✔

WRIT PETITION No.11510 of 2025 Dated:16.07.2026

chs

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead