Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/19350/2026 of G.Srinivasula Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 15 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE 16th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 19350/2026 Between: 1. G.SRINIVASULA REDDY, S/O. G.VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,

APHC010359532026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 16th DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 19350/2026

Between:

1. G.SRINIVASULA REDDY, S/O. G.VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, AGED

ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC.GRADE-LL CONTRACTOR, RESIDENT OF

D.NO.96/217, UTUKURU VILLAGE, C.K DINNE MANDAL, KADAPA, YS.R DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY,

MUNICIPAL

ADMINISTRATION

AND

URBAN

DEVELOPMENT

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT

BUILDINGS,

VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT,522237.

2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT,522237.

3. THE

KADAPA

MUNICIPAL

CORPORATION,

REP

BY

ITS..

COMMISSIONER, KADAPA, YS.R DISTRICT,516001.

4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

KADAPA, YS.R DISTRICT,516001.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in releasing the net amounts of Rs.27,54,513/- (Rupees

Twenty Seven Lakhs Fifty Four Thousand Five Hundred and Thirteen only), towards the work duly executed by me inspite of raising the CFMS Id for clearance of the Bills as arbitrary, illegal and well established legal principles apart from being violative of the fundamental and Constitutional rights guaranteed to me under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300 A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents pay the amount of Rs.27,54,513/- (Rupees Twenty Seven Lakhs Fifty Four Thousand Five Hundred and Thirteen only) forthwith for all the works and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to take necessary action for payment of an amount of Rs.27,54,513/- (Rupees Twenty Seven Lakhs Fifty Four Thousand Five Hundred and Thirteen only) towards the work duly executed by me which are admitted by the Respondents, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. PAPUDIPPU SASHIDAR REDDY

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP

2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

WRIT PETITION NO: 19350 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was entrusted with the execution of the works. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the declaring the inaction of the respondents in releasing the net amount of Rs.27,54,513/- (Rupees Twenty-Seven Lakhs Fifty-Four Thousand Five Hundred and Thirteen only) towards the work duly executed by the petitioner, despite raising the CFMS ID for clearance of the bills.

2. It is submitted that the petitioner had completed the work entrusted to him and that the competent authority of the respondents had also approved the payment due and payable to the petitioner. The respondents have also recorded the progress of the works and the amounts due and payable to the petitioner in the M-Book.

3. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Sri P. Vengal Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Municipality, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance and Planning.

4. During the course of hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Municipality submits that the work has been completed and that the petitioner has also submitted the final bill and the amounts due and payable to the petitioner have been duly admitted. It is submitted that further funds are awaited and that, soon after the release of the funds, the bill due and payable to the petitioner shall be cleared.

5. Recording the submissions, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage, directing the respondents to verify and release the payments due and payable to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

6. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:16.07.2026 RSD

WRIT PETITION NO: 19350 of 2026 Date: 16.07.2026

RSD

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead