Andhra Pradesh High Court

CMA/1/2012 of ALLA SANTOSHI BINDU @ BINDU MADHAVI AND ANOTHER Vs KANDARAPU VENKATA DURGA KUMARI AND ANOTHER on 14 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3603] WEDNESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1/2012 Between: 1. ALLA SANTOSHI BINDU @

APHC010268092012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA

PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1/2012

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. ALLA SANTOSHI BINDU @ BINDU MADHAVI AND ANOTHER, W/O BALA SUBRAHMANYAM C/O ALLA VENKATA REDDY, MINERAL WATER PLANT, PIPULA ROAD, NEW AZITHSINGH NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA-15.

2. K.MAHESH REDDY, S/O K.RAM MOHAN REDDY R/O D.NO.5-175 8TH WARD, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...APPELLANT(S) AND

1. KANDARAPU VENKATA DURGA KUMARI AND ANOTHER, W/O LATE RAM MOHAN REDDY R/O D.NO. 14-402, NEAR DALDA COMPANY, KRISHNA NAGAR, PANCHAYAT,

2. THE SENIOR RECORDS OFFICER, RECORDS, MADRAS ENGINEER GROUP C/O 56 APO, BANGALORE- 900 493

...RESPONDENT(S):

Appeal Under Section_____against ordersset aside the Order and Decree dated 22-11-2011 passed in SOP.No. 3/09 by allowing this appeal IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 7 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings pursuant to the decree and order passed by the Hon'ble Principal Junior Civil Judge,Mangalagiri in S.O.P.No. 3 of 2009 dated 22-11-2011 pending disposal of the main CMA in the interest of justice. IA NO: 5 OF 2012(CMAMP 40936 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant(S):

1. G VIJAYA BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. NARASIMHA RAO M R L The Court made the following:

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1 of 2012 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh)

When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant(s). Even on the earlier occasion, i.e., on 01.07.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant(s). Accordingly, the matter was adjourned to 15.07.2026, i.e., today. However, even today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant(s).

In the above circumstances, this Court is of the considered view that the appellant(s) are not interested in prosecuting the present Appeal. Accordingly, the civil miscellaneous appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH

_________________________________ JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR Date: 15.07.2026 klk

C.M.A.No.1 of 2012

Dated: 15.07.2026

klk

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead