Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/1256/2011 of N.RAJYA LAKSHMI Vs N.SATISH on 14 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3603] WEDNESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1256/2011 Between: 1. N.RAJYA LAKSHMI, W/O SATISH PARENTS'
APHC010214602011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1256/2011
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. N.RAJYA LAKSHMI, W/O SATISH PARENTS' PROTECTION R/O KUCHIPUDI, AMARTHALUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT AND
1. N SATISH, S/o late Sivaramaiah Lands R/o Budampadu, Guntur.
...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 2 OF 2011(CMAMP 44023 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant:
1. V S R ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondent:
1. The Court made the following:
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh) The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed aggrieved by the order passed in H.M.O.P.No.179/2008 dated 30.3.2011 on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tenali. A perusal of the docket shows on many occasions, the matter has been adjourned at the request of the learned counsel for the appellant for getting instructions. Still the counsel is not able to place any fresh instructions. As the appeal is filed against the dismissal of the H.M.O.P. filed under Order 13(1)(ia)&(ib) of H.M.Act and the O.P. is itself of the year 2008, even after lapse of approximately 20 years, no instructions from the appellant. Considering the same, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution giving liberty that if parties intend to agitate their rights, they can file an application for restoration and if any application is filed for restoration, the same may be considered. No costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
__________________________ JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR 15.7.2026 RD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.1256 of 2011 15.7.2026 RD