Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/1429/2025 of JAKKULA ESWARUDU Vs THE STATE OF AP on 14 July 2026
for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010026402025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 1429/2025 Between: 1.
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement :
Date of uploading :
APHC010026402025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 1429/2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. JAKKULA ESWARUDU, S/O. VENKATARAMAIAH, AGED 59 YEARS, OCC- CONTRACT LECTURE(TELUGU), GOVT. JUNIOR COLLEGE FOR GIRLS, CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE COMMISSIONER, BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR, BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. GOVERNMENT JUNIOR COLLEGE FOR GIRLS, REP.BY THE PRINCIPAL, CHIRALA VILLAGE AND MADNAL,
NEW BAPATLA DISTRICT ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in orally directing the petitioner to retire on attaining the age of 60 years i.e 25-01-2025 as Telugu Lecturer Government Junior College for Girls, Chirala Village and Mandal, New Bapatla District erstwhile Prakasam District instead of allowing the petitioner to continue till attaining the age of superannuation i.e 62 years despite the GO Ms No. 15 Finance HR IVFR and LR Department dt- 30- 01-2022 and the orders passed in WP No. 10784 of 2023 as illegal arbitrary unconstitutional and violative of Article 14,16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner beyond 60 years i.e 25- 01-2025till attaining the age of superannuation at 62 years as Telugu Lecturer Government Junior College for Girls, Chirala Village and Mandal, Bapatla District erstwhile Prakasam District with all consequential benefits and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Telugu Lecturer, Government Junior College, Chirala Village and Mandal, Baptia District erstwhile Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh beyond 60 years i.e 25-01- 2025 till the attaining the age of superannuation i.e 62 years pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant leave to file counter affidavit in W.P.No.1429 of 2025 in the interest of justice and may be pleased to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PAVAN KUMAR PASUPULETI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES III The Court made the following:
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.1429 of 2025 O R DE R:
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 15.07.2026 KLP