Andhra Pradesh High Court
AS/350/2009 of Mr.O. Haranath Chetty, Vs Smt. B. Rajamma on 14 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] WEDNESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 350/2009 Between: 1. MR.O. HARANATH CHETTY,, S/O VENKATASUBBAIAH CHETTY EMPLOYEE R/O D.NO. 1/39
APHC010522262009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA
KRISHNA RAO
APPEAL SUIT NO: 350/2009
Between:
1. MR.O. HARANATH CHETTY,, S/O VENKATASUBBAIAH
CHETTY EMPLOYEE R/O D.NO. 1/39 NARASINGAPURAM
VILLAGE, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT
...APPELLANT
AND
1. SMT B RAJAMMA, W/o Late B. Subbaramaiah Chetty Housewife R/o 19-4-3/C3, STV Nagar, Tirupathi, Chittoor District
...RESPONDENT
appeal against the judgment and decree dated 18-03-2009
passed in O.S.No. 448 of 2004 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tirupathi IA NO: 1 OF 2009(ASMP 1091 OF 2009
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant injunction restraining the respondent herein from alienating the petition schedule properties in O.S.No. 448 of 2004 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Tirupathi either by sale, transfer of creating any charge or any mode of transfer of the petition schedule properties to third parties
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. KOWTURU PAVAN KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. J UGRANARASIMHA
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
APPEAL SUIT No.350 of 2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
Today when the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”, Sri Jagadeeshwar Katragadda, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Kowturu Pavan Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant, appeared through virtual mode and Sri J. Ugranarsimha, learned counsel for the respondent, is present.
2. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the respondent has passed away during the pendency of the appeal and the appellant is not inclined to take steps in the matter. He further submitted that no further orders are required in the present appeal suit.
3. By recording the said submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non- prosecution. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 15.07.2026 LSP
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
APPEAL SUIT No.350 of 2009
Date: 15.07.2026 LSP