Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/7600/2026 of JAKKAMPUDI ASHOK Vs UNION OF INDIA on 13 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7600/2026 Between: JAKKAMPUDI ASHOK, S/O SINGAYAH, AGED 35 YEARS, FARMER, R/O PASUMARRU VILLAGE,
APHC010134352026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 7600/2026
Between:
JAKKAMPUDI ASHOK, S/O SINGAYAH, AGED 35 YEARS, FARMER, R/O
PASUMARRU
VILLAGE,
CHILAKALURIPETMANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. UNION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF
AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE, ROOM NO. 115, KRISHI BHAWAN , DR. RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD, NEW
DELHI,PIN CODE-110001
2. SMALL FARMERS AGRIBUSINESS CONSORTIUM SFAC, REP
BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR NCUL AUDITORIUM BUILDING , 5TH FLOOR SIRI INSTITUTIONAL AREA, AUGUST KRANTI
MARG, NEW DELHI,PIN CODE-110016
3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT
OF
AGRICULTURE
,
SECRETARIAT AMARAVATI,PIN CODE-522238
4. COMMISSIONER
AND
DIRECTOR
OF
AGRICULTURAL
MARKETING, ANDHRA PRADESH,GUNTUR PIN CODE-522004
5. DISTRICT
COLLECTOR
PALNADU
DISTRICT,
NARSARAOPET,PIN CODE-522601
6. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE APMC, REP
BY ITS SECRETARY CHILAKALURIPET, PIN CODE-522616
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the Respondents in failing to implement the mandatory e-NAM online auction and e-trading procedures at Chilakaluripet Agricultural Produce Market Committee, despite the said market having been integrated and notified as an e-NAM market, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith ensure effective implementation of e-NAM
guidelines including online bidding, transparent price discovery and digital trading system at Chilakaluripet Agricultural Produce Market Committee and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
RAVI TEJA GUDE
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR AGRICULTURE
2. Gangisetty Rajeswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Agricultural Marketing Committees
3. AMRUTHA BOPPUDI (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :
1. The present Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in implementing the mandatory e- NAM (National Agriculture Market) online auction and e-trading system at the Chilakaluripet Agricultural Produce Market Committee, despite the market having been integrated and notified under the e-NAM platform, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India. They consequently seek a direction to the respondents to ensure effective implementation of the e-NAM guidelines by introducing online bidding, transparent price discovery and a digital trading system in the said market.
2. Heard Sri Ravi Teja Gude, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri GangisettyRajeswara Rao, learned Standing Counsel for Agriculture Marketing Committees and Ms.M.Sandhya Deepthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Agriculture.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that the respondents have failed to implement the e-NAM facility in the Chilakaluripet Agricultural Produce Market Committee, despite the market having been integrated with the e-NAM platform. He would contend that such inaction is intended to favour a limited group of buyers, thereby depriving the farmers of the benefits of a transparent and competitive bidding process. It is submitted that the non-implementation of the e-NAM system defeats the very object of the scheme, namely, ensuring fair price discovery and providing better market access to farmers. He would further submit that the Government of India has formulated the e-NAM scheme and issued guidelines to the States and Union Territories requiring them to take all necessary legislative and executive measures to ensure effective implementation of the scheme in all notified market yards.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Agriculture would submit that an appropriate direction may be issued to respondent No.4 to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner and to take all necessary and effective steps for implementation of the e-NAM scheme by issuing appropriate directions to the concerned Agricultural Market Committee. She would further submit that the requisite infrastructure may be provided and adequate awareness programmes may be conducted among the farmers and traders to facilitate effective implementation of the e-NAM system within a reasonable time frame.
5. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Agricultural Market Committee would submit that it is the statutory obligation of the Market Committee to provide necessary infrastructure and facilities to farmers and traders to enable them to carry on agricultural marketing activities within the notified market area. He would submit that the Market Committee is committed to discharging its statutory responsibilities in accordance with the provisions of the relevant enactment.
6. In the light of the above submissions made and since the representation of the petitioner, dated 06.02.2026 is pending for consideration before all the respondents, it is apposite to dispose of the present writ petition with a direction to Respondent No.4/Commissioner & Director of Agriculture Marketing, Andhra Pradesh at Guntur, to consider the representation of the petitioner and take all measures for effective implementation of the e-Nam facility as prayed for in the interest of Formers and Traders, as per the Rules and Law, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim orders granted earlier if any, stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, stand closed.
________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:14.07.2026 Krs
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.7600 of 2026
( ORDER )
DATE: 14.07.2026
Krs