Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/736/2025 of MARAGANTI SANDEEP Vs MARAGANTI ANUSHA @ DALIPARTHI ANUSHA on 13 July 2026
on --- Judgment pronounced on 14.07.2026 Judgment uploaded on 15.07.2026 APHC010566582025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 736
Judgment reserved on
---
Judgment pronounced on 14.07.2026
Judgment uploaded on
15.07.2026
APHC010566582025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
TUESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 736 OF 2025
Between:
1. MARAGANTI SANDEEP, S/o. Murali Krishna, Converted Christian, aged about 27 years, R/o Chinnapuram, Machilipatnam Mandal, Krishna District.
...Petitioner
AND
1. MARAGANTI ANUSHA DALIPARTHI ANUSHA, W/o Sandeep, D/o Daliparthi Subramanyam, Converted Christian, aged about 23 years, R/o Chinnapuram, Machilipatnam Mandal, Krishna District.
...Respondent
Counsel for the Petitioner: PILLI SUNDEEP
Counsel for the Respondent SIVA RAMA KRISHNA KOLLURU
The Court made the following order:
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
(per Hon’ble Sri Justice D. Ramesh)
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
2. This Appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.06.2025 passed in D.O.P.No.174 of 2022 by the learned IX Additional District and Sessions Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam. Whereby, the Court below allowed the D.O.P.No.174 of 2012 filed by the respondent/wife under section 32 of Indian Divorce Act, 1869 seeking restitution of conjugal rights. Aggrieved by the said Order, the husband/appellant has preferred the present Appeal.
3. While Appeal was pending, the parties have entered into a compromise on certain conditions. The learned counsel for the appellant has submitted the Agreement Deed across the Bar and requested to permit withdrawal of the Appeal.
4. Considering the submissions and on perusal of the Agreement Deed, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH, J
____________________________ JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR, J Dt: 14.07.2026 JKS
Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ☑
AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 736 OF 2025
14.07.2026
JKS