Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLRC/667/2015 of ANSARI SALEEM, GUNTUR DIST. Vs P.P., HYD & ANO on 13 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

: 14.07.2026 Date of uploading : 15.07.2026 APHC010011922015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] TUESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 667/2015 Between: 1.

Date of pronouncement : 14.07.2026

Date of uploading : 15.07.2026

APHC010011922015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3604]

TUESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 667/2015

Between:

1. ANSARI SALEEM, GUNTUR DIST., S/O. SARDAR OCC: BUSINESS

R/O. D.NO. 4-11-13 RAILWAY STATION ROAD NIDUBROLU

GUNTUR DISTRICT

...PETITIONER

AND

1. P P HYD ANO, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT

OF A.P. HYDERABAD

2. AMARA NAGA RAJU KUMAR, S/O. LATE NARAYANA RAO OCC:

BUSINESS R/O. NEAR GANDHI STATUE CENTER MAIN ROAD

PONNUR GUNTUR DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S):

Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 09.04.2015

in Crl.M.P.No. 48/2015 in C.A.No.164/2015 passed by the Hon'ble III Addl.

Sessions Judge, Guntur and be pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 1105 OF 2015

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dated 9-4-2015 in Crl.M.P.No.48/2015 in

C.A.No. 164/2015 passed by the Hon'ble III Addl. Sessions Judge, Guntur and sentence imposed by the Hon'ble Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ponnur by order dated 23- 3-2015 in C.C.No. 99/2013 pending disposal of this Criminal Revision Case Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SYED KHADER MASTAN

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

The Court made the following:

HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.667 OF 2015

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Sri Shaik Altaf, learned counsel, who is representing Sri Syed Khader Mastan, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, submitted that the matter is already settled out of Court and sought permission to withdraw this revision.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision case is dismissed as withdrawn.

As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

________________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J

14.07.2026 Vns

Whether the order is : ✓ Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No ✓ Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead