Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/35964/2025 of GODLAVEETI MADHAVI Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 13 July 2026
for orders : --- Date of pronouncement : 14.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010696592025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 35964/2025
Date of reserved for orders
: ---
Date of pronouncement
: 14.07.2026
Date of uploading
:
APHC010696592025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 35964/2025
Between:
1. GODLAVEETI MADHAVI, W/O RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38
YEARS,
H.NO.
976/A,
SURISIDDUPALLI,
CHERLOPALLI,
TEKURIPET ( POST), YSR KADAPA DISTRICT - 516505.
2. BATTAPOTHULA GURAIAH,, S/O B.CHINNA GURAIAH, AGED
ABOUT 49 YEARS, H.NO - 1/113, GANAGANAPALLI VILLAGE, S.A. KASINAAYANA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT -
516217.
3. MOPURI RAJA GOPAL,, S/O. KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46
YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 1-57-B, KAPU STEET, PORUMAMILA
VILLAGE AND MANDAL, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT - 516193.
4. POLU RAGHU RAMI REDDY,, S/O. P.POLI REDDY, AGED
ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. SAVISETTI PALLI VILLAGE AND
POST, S.A. KASINAAYANA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT -
516193.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
SCHOOL
EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGUPUDI, AMARAVATI,
GUNTUR DISTRICT. A.P.522238.
2. THE
COMMISSIONER
AND
DIRECTOR
OF
SCHOOL
EDUCATION,
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
VIJAYAWADA,KRISHNA
DISTRICT. A.P.520001
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN, DSC 2008
ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. A.P.515001.
4. THE
DISTRICT
EDUCATIONAL
OFFICER,
ANANTHAPUR
DISTRICT. A.P.515001.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order, or a direction, or a writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in reinstating the Petitioners into their respective post of Secondary Grade Teacher (Telugu Medium) in pursuance of the common order of Hon'ble A.P. State Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad dated 03.08.2012 in O.A. No. 6965/2011 and batch,as illegal. Arbitrary, Unconstitutional and violative of the common judgment of Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court dated 25.04.2025 in W.P. Nos. 4762 of 2021, 34155 of 2018 and 25039 of 2020 and Order of this Hon'ble Court Order dated 21.08.2025 in W.P No. 21925 of 2025
and Order of this Hon'ble Court in Order dated 25.11.2025 in W.P No.
32723 of 2025 consequently to direct the respondents to reinstate the Petitioners into their respective posts of Secondary Grade Teachers (Telugu Medium), and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioners into their Services as Secondary Grade Teacher (Telugu Medum) in pursuance of the common Judgment of Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court dated 25.04.2025 in W.P. Nos. 4762 of 2021, 34155 of 2018 and 25039 of 2020 and Order of this Hon’ble Court Order dated 21.08.2025
in W.P No. 21925 of 2025 and Order of this Hon’ble Court in Order dated
25.11.2025 in W.P No. 32723 of 2025pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. KALEEMULLA S
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES III
The Court made the following:
WRIT PETITION No.35964 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. Learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. No order as to costs.
5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
Date: 14.07.2026 chs Whether the order is: Speaking ✔ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ✔
WRIT PETITION No.35964 of 2025 Dated: 14.07.2026
chs