Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1624/2025 of REGIMANI PADMAVATHI Vs RAGIMANU GANGADHAR on 13 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1624/2025 Between: 1. REGIMANI PADMAVATHI, W/O. R. GANGADHAR, D/O. V. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O. H.
APHC010321462025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3560]
TUESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1624/2025
Between:
1. REGIMANI PADMAVATHI, W/O. R. GANGADHAR, D/O. V.
NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O. H. NO. 45/24/12-A, ASHOK NAGAR, KURNOOL.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. RAGIMANU GANGADHAR, S/o. R. Nagaraju, aged about 39 years, Bethamcharla Village and Mandai Kurnool District, Presently working as Executive Engineer (SW to SE(FC-II)), Office of the Superintending Engineer, FC-II, Rohini Office Complex, Sector-15, Near Gas Godown, Opposite Taj Apartments, Rohini, Delhi-110085. Mobile. 9030435590.
...CONTEMNOR
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to direct the notice to the respondent herein and punish the respondent under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for deliberate. intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 30.12.2016 in I.A. No.1 of 2016 (CRL.RC.MP No. 5192 of 2016) in Crl.R.C. No. 3322 of 2016 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. Y V S S DHARANEESH
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. V V N NARASIMHAM
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1624/2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. Pursuant to the direction of this Court, dated 30.06.2026, the petitioner filed a Memo on 13.07.2026, wherefrom it appears that the respondent has paid entire maintenance arrears due as on 30.06.2026.
2. Considering the Memo and considering the conduct of the respondent, I find nothing to proceed further with this contempt case.
3. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed.
4. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this contempt case shall stand closed.
____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Dt.14.07.2026 BV
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No