Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/31134/2018 of Killi Seshu Mohan Appala Naidu Vs ANDHRA BANK on 13 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 31134/2018 Between: 1. KILLI SESHU MOHAN APPALA NAIDU, S/O LAXMANA RAO, AGED 42 YEARS OCC. BUSINESS, NEAR
APHC010642382018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 31134/2018
Between:
1. KILLI SESHU MOHAN APPALA NAIDU, S/O LAXMANA RAO, AGED
42 YEARS OCC. BUSINESS, NEAR GOVERNMENT JUNIOR
COLLEGE,
AMADALAVALASA
MUNICIPALITY,
SRIKAKULAM
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. ANDHRA BANK, REP. BY ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, BANK
STREET, KOTI, HYDERABAD
2. THE ANDHRA BANK, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED
OFFICER AND CHIEF MANAGER, AMADALAVALASA BRANCH, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
3. SRI
SEEPANA
KOTESWARA
RAO,
S/O
LATE
SIMHADRI,
PROPRIETOR, M/S LOKESH STORE CRUSHERS, R/O
CHINTHALABADAVANGI KARAKAVALASA POST AND PANTHAYAT,
L.N. PETA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the action of the 2nd respondent Bank in not permitting the petitioner to clear off the total arrears of the 3rd respondent loan account and to declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct
the 2nd respondents Bank to grant permission to the petitioner to clear the total arrears of the loan account of the 3rd respondent and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent Bank to permit the petitioner to clear the total arrears of the loan account of the 3rd respondent by duly considering the representation dated 14-12-2017 made by the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CH S V SURAJ
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V DYUMANI
2.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri Ch.S.V.Suraj, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that a memo dated 04.07.2026 has been filed before the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.
2. The same is placed on record.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 14.07.2026. JLV
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 31134/2018
Date: 14.07.2026 JLV