Andhra Pradesh High Court
FCA/100/2010 of E.CHANDRA MOULI, RAYACHUR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE Vs E.MANJUL, ARAVINDA NAGAR, ANANTHAPUR on 13 July 2026
reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010237162010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3602] TUESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement :
Date of uploading :
APHC010237162010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 100/2010
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. E.CHANDRA MOULI, RAYACHUR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE, S/O. GURARAGHAVAIAH POINTS MAN, RAILWAY DEPARTMENT CHIKKASAGAR VILLAGE, RAILWAY STATION, RAYACHUR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE.
...APPELLANT AND
1. E MANJUL ARAVINDA NAGAR ANANTHAPUR, W/o. E.Chendra Mouli R/o. D.No. 11/49, Aravinda Nagar, Ananthapur.
...RESPONDENT Appeal under section________ against orders to allow the appeal by setting aside the order in F.C.O.P.No. 77 of 2009 dated 22-01-2010 on the file of the Family Court Judge, Anantapur together with cost. IA NO: 1 OF 2010(FCAMP 255 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in F.C.O.P.No. 77 of 2009 on the file of the Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ananthapur dated 22-01-2010, pending disposal of the appeal. Counsel for the Appellant:
1. P N SUNIL KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent:
1. The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.100 of 2010 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)
On 23.06.2026, there was no representation for the appellant. Hence, the matter is posted to 07.07.2026 ‘for dismissal’. On 07.07.2026 also there is no representation for the appellant. To give one more opportunity to the appellant, it is posted to today. Today also there is no representation for the appellant.
2. It appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute this Appeal.
3. Accordingly, this Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
4. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
____________________________ JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM Dated: 14.07.2026 TM
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.100 of 2010
Dated: 14.07.2026 TM