Andhra Pradesh High Court

WA/851/2026 of ADAPA VENU GOPALA KRISHNA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 13 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

for judgment: ____ Date of pronouncement: 14.07.2026 Date of uploading: ______ APHC010353192026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR WRIT APPEAL NO: 851 OF

Date of reserved for judgment: ____

Date of pronouncement: 14.07.2026

Date of uploading: ______

APHC010353192026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

TUESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR

WRIT APPEAL NO: 851 OF 2026

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent above-named Appellant aggrieved by the Order dated 06.07.2026 passed in W.P.No. 17821

of 2026 by learned Single Judge, begs to present the memorandum of Writ Appeal on the following grounds among others Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. ADAPA VENU GOPALA KRISHNA, S/o. A. Sattiraju, Aged about 50 years, R/o. 1-22, Sukravarapu Peta, Draksharama, East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh

- 533262. ...Petitioner AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat Buildings ,Velagapudi, Amaravathi,Guntur District. 2.

2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Secretariat Building, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

3. The Director of Adult Education, Department of Adult Education, Amaravathi, Andhra Pradesh.

4. The Deputy Director of Adult Education, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.

5. Mr E Janaradhan Goud, S/o Not known to the Petitioner, Aged about 49 years, O/o Director of Adult Education Collectorate Complex, East Cellar, Kurnool, Kurnool district. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: KALAKOTI SUNIL KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES III

The Court made the following judgment: The appeal is filed assailing the non-consideration of the interim order dated 06.07.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No.17821 of 2026.

2. The contention of the appellant is that, although the case of the 5th respondent was considered and notional seniority was granted by placing reliance upon the orders passed in W.P. No.22610 of 2021 and W.P. No.22119 of 2021, as well as G.O.Ms. No.38, dated 04.06.2019, the 5th respondent is, in fact, not a party to the aforesaid writ petitions. It is further contended that the said G.O., which has been relied upon for granting notional seniority, is also not applicable to the case of the 5th respondent.

3. It is the further contention of the appellant that, based on the grant of such notional seniority, the respondents proceeded with the process of promotions, compelling the appellant to file the present Writ Appeal.

4. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents placed reliance on G.O.Ms. No.46, Finance (HR.I-Planning & Policy) Department, dated 06.07.2026, whereby general directions were issued, and on the consequential Memo No.3301035-FIN01-HROPDPP(RRD)/17/2026-HR-I, dated 06.07.2026. Under the said Memo, all Secretaries to Government, Heads of Departments and Regional Heads were directed to effect promotions only up to 30.07.2026. Since the said cut-off date has already expired, there is no proposal to effect promotions.

5. However, it is submitted that the promotion exercise under PO-2025 has been extended until further orders.

6. In view of the above circumstances, as there is presently no proposal to effect promotions, no further orders are required to be passed at this stage.

7. Accordingly, the Appeal is closed, giving liberty to the State to file its counter-affidavit in the writ petition within a period of four (04) weeks. There shall no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Appeal shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH

________________________ JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR Date : 14.07.2026 CHD

Whether the order is: Speaking YES Reasoned NO Reportable NO Non-reportable YES

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR

WRIT APPEAL No.851 of 2026 Date: 14th July, 2026

CHD

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead