Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/18850/2023 of SRI SAINATH CONSTRUCTIONS Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 12 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

for orders : Date of pronouncement :13.07.2026 Date of uploading : 15.07.2026 APHC010364952023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY, THE 13th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:

Date of reserved for orders :

Date of pronouncement :13.07.2026

Date of uploading : 15.07.2026

APHC010364952023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3332]

MONDAY, THE 13th DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 18850/2023

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SRI SAINATH CONSTRUCTIONS, REP., BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, M RAVINDRA BABU S/O SRINIVAS, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR D.NO. 8/439/11, UPSTAIRS, SOUTH BY-PASS ROAD, NIRMAL NAGAR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TRANSPORT, ROADS AND BUILDINGS (ROADS-III) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI,GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

3. THE ANDHRA PRADESH CENTER FOR FINANCIAL SYSTEMS AND SERVICES, 6TH FLOOR, C- BLOCK, ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, NTR DISTRICT (OLD KRISHNA DISTRICT), REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT

4. THE ENGINEERINCHIEF RANDB, NH AND CRF, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT (OLD KRISHNA DISTRICT)

5. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, (RANDB) CIRCLE,GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (RANDB) DIVISION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

7. THE DIRECTOR OF WORKS AND ACCOUNTS, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT (OLD KRISHNA DISTRICT)

8. THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondents in not releasing the 10th and final Bill amount of Rs 3,23,99,078/- even after finalizing the bill payable to the petitioner in relation to the execution of work i.e. (a) Widening and Strengthening of Piduguralla-Govindapuram road from Km 0/0 to 5/0 (b) Widening and Strengthening of Julakallu-Piduguralla road from Km 0/0 to 10/864 in Guntur District vide Agreement No. 121/2017-18 dt 29-11-2017 as the same is illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents to release an amount of Rs 3,23,99,078/- with interest 12percent per annum to the petitioner in respect of execution of afore mentioned work forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to release an amount of Rs 3,23,99,078/- for the 10th and final Bill to the petitioner in respect of work done i.e. (a) Widening and Strengthening of Piduguralla-Govindapuram road from Km 0/0 to 5/0 (b) Widening and Strengthening of Julakallu-Piduguralla road from Km 0/0 to 10/864 in Guntur District vide Agreement No. 121/2017-18 dt 29-11-2017, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant Leave for filing of the Counter Affidavit in WP.No. 18850 of 2023 and

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. KAVITHA GOTTIPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS

2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following order:

Aggrieved by the non-payment of bill amounts to the petitioner in relation to the completed contract works, the present writ petition is filed.

2. Heard Ms B.Nirupama, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abdul Rasheed, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings Department.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the authorities have paid the entitled amount to the petitioner.

4. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is closed. No costs.

Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.

________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 13.07.2026 BRS

Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead