Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/1921/2026 of GNANA PRAKASH SEERAM Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 12 July 2026
for orders : Date of pronouncement : 13.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010029162026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE 13th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 1921/2026 Between: 1.
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement : 13.07.2026
Date of uploading :
APHC010029162026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 13th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 1921/2026
Between:
1. GNANA PRAKASH SEERAM, , S/O. ANTHONY SEERAM, AGED
ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O. 34-13-31, ROSSILLION, OPPOSITE
RAILWAY STATION, GNANAPURAM, VISHAKAPATNAM (URBAN), VISHAKAPTNAM. - (530004)
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPLE
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION
AND
URBAN
DEVELOPMENT,
SECRATARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.-522237
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY
HOUSING
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.-522237
3. THE
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
FINANCE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR
DISTRICT.-522237
4. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD, REP
BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR, 1ST FLOOR, VUDA BUILDING, SECTOR-XII, USHODAYA JN., M.V.P. COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM-
530017.
5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKAHAPATNAM. 530017
6. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANAKAPALLI.531001
7. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM,VISAKHAPATNAM
DISTRICT. 530017
8. THE
SUBCOLLECTOR,
NARSIPATNAM,
VISAKHAPATNAM
DISTRICT. 531116
9. NARSIPATNAM MUNICIPALITY, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
NARSIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 531116
10. THE
REVENUE
DIVISIONAL
OFFICER,
NARSIPATNAM,
VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 531116
11. THE TAHSILDAR, NARSIPATRIAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
531116
12. THE COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, REP
BY ITS DIRECTOR, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA.520002
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring the action on the part of the respondents herein, not releasing and pay the bill amounts worth of Rs.7,08,969/- (Rupees Seven Lakh eight thousand nine hundred and sixty nine rupees only), even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the works I.
Layout development with formation of gravel roads (approach roads 3 cross roads) and Providing RCC survey poles for demarcation of plots to the house sites at Baligattam in survey no. 693 of Narshipatnam Municipality under the YSR Gruhaa Vasathi Scheme vide MBook No.87/19-20, dt.10.02.2021
(Rs.2,79.079/-) II. Layout development with formation of approach roads to the house sites layouts at Bhaligatham in survey no. 693 of Narshipatnam Municipality under the YSR Gruha Vasathi Scheme vide M. Book No.83/19- 20, dt. 10.02.2021 (Rs.4,29,890) as bad, illegal, arbitrary, improper, unjust and against the Article 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay the amounts of Rs. 7,08,970/- (Rupees Seven Lakh eight thousand nine hundred and sixty nine rupees only) forthwith without any more delay and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent to forthwith consider releasing the amount Rs. 708969 (rupees seven lakhs eight thousand and sixty nine rupees only)
payable to the petitioner herein pending disposal of the writ peititon and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to Grant Leave to file a counter in the above W.P.No.1921 of 2026 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P NANILU NAIDU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV
2. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni,Standing Counsel For Municipalities
3. GP FOR REVENUE
4. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
5. GP FOR HOUSING
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:-
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has completed the works entrusted by the District Collector, namely: (i) Layout development with formation of gravel roads (approach roads and three cross roads) and providing RCC survey poles for demarcation of plots to the house sites at Baligattam in Survey No.693 of Narsipatnam Municipality under the YSR Gruha Vasathi Scheme, vide M-Book No.87/19-20, dated 10.02.2021, and (ii) Layout development with formation of approach roads to the house sites layouts at Baligattam in Survey No.693 of Narsipatnam Municipality under the YSR Gruha Vasathi Scheme, vide M-Book No.83/19-20, dated 10.02.2021.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the 9th respondent has filed a counter and, in paragraph No.6 thereof, it is stated as follows:-
6. It is respectfully submitted that the works mentioned in the Writ Affidavit are relating to the YSR Gruha Vasathi scheme which is a government initiative for providing certain amenities for weaker section housing layout colonies taken up during the year 2020 and 2021. The YSR Gruhavasathi funds are under the administrative control of District Collector and the administrative sanction for taking up the works under this scheme shall be sanctioned by the District Collector including release of funds under the relevant head of account relating to YSR Gruha Vasathi scheme. It is submitted that the petitioner also admitted the fact of the same that these works sanctioned under the same YSR Gruha Vasathi scheme.
3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 4th respondent submits that the bills are not payable by the 4th respondent and that it is the 6th respondent who is the sanctioning authority under the Government scheme and, therefore, the competent authority to sanction and release the payments.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the M-Books filed by the petitioner would indicate that the works have been completed in all respects and that the payments are due and payable. It is submitted that the District Collector/6th respondent, being the competent authority, shall release the payments due and payable to the petitioner.
5. Recording the submissions, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage, directing the concerned respondents to verify and release the payments due and payable to the petitioner, if not already released, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 13.07.2026 PNS
Whether the order is: Speaking
Reasoned ☑ Reportable
Non-reportable ☑