Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/18639/2026 of ST JACOBS AIDED UP AND SCHOOL Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 12 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

for orders : ---------------- Date of pronouncement : 13.07.2026 Date of uploading : 15.07.2026 APHC010345662026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] MONDAY, THE 13th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT

Date of reserved for orders

:

----------------

Date of pronouncement

:

13.07.2026

Date of uploading

:

15.07.2026

APHC010345662026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE 13th DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NO: 18639 OF 2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. ST JACOBS AIDED UP AND SCHOOL, MUNDLAPADU, REP., BY ITS CORRESPONDENT, V.J.F. RAMESH BABU, MUNDALAPADU, GIDDELUR MANDAL, MARKAPURAM DISTRICT - A.P.

2. L.M.K. HIGH SCHOOL,, KANIGIRI, REP., BY ITS CORRESPONDENT, BALAJI RAO, KANAGARI, KANAGARI MANDAL, MARKAPURAM DISTRICT - A.P.

3. SRI BHRAMARAMBA AIDED PRIMARY SCHOOL,, CUMBUM, REP., BY ITS SRI LAKSHMI, CUMBUM,

CUMBUM MANDAL, MARKAPURAM DISTRICT - A.P.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P-522503.

2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, SECRETARIATE BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P. - 522503

3. THE DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SREEANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM,

KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P-521456.

4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER MARKAPURAM DISTRICT, NEAR GANDHI BAZAR, MARKAPURAM, MARKAPURAM DISTRICT - A.P. - 523316

5. THE MANDAL EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, GIDDELUR, GIDDELUR MANDAL, MARKAPURAM DISTRICT - A.P - 522101

6. THE MANDAL EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KANAGARI MANDAL, KANAGARI, KANAGARI MANDAL, MARKAPURAM DISTRICT -A.P. - 523230

7. THE MANDAL EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CUMBUM MANDAL, CUMBUM, CUMBUM MANDAL, MARKAPURAM DISTRICT -A.P. - 523333

...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. C SUNIL KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION

2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following Order:

Heard Sri C.Sunil Kumar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for School Education appearing for the respondents.

2. The instant Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to release the maintenance grant to the petitioners’ schools for the academic years 2023-2024, 2024-2025 and 2025-2026.

3. Today, when the matter has been taken up for consideration, both the learned counsel submitted that the issue involved in the present Writ Petition is squarely covered by the earlier Judgment rendered by this court in W.P.No.3449 of 2003 dated 30.09.2016 wherein it was held that: “21. In any view of the matter, the contention of the learned Government Pleader is that the petitioner is not entitled to maintenance grant in view of G.O.Ms.No.320, which was struck down by this Court in the Judgment referred supra. Even otherwise, the discriminatory attitude of the Government giving concession to one educational institution and denying benefit to the petitioner’s educational institution cannot be encouraged by the Courts, since it is arbitrary and discriminatory in not releasing grant-in- aid to the petitioner’s association whose object is to provide free education. In those circumstances, this Court has no option except to hold that the inaction of the respondents is arbitrary in not releasing the maintenance grant-in-aid to the petitioner’s educational institution and consequently, I hold that the petitioner is entitled to all the benefits as decided in Recognised Schools Managements Associations case. Hence, the respondents are directed to work out maintenance grant @6% and arrange to pay the same within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order to the petitioner’s educational institution, on par with other Schools.

22. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is allowed.”

4. Following the above order, this Writ Petition is allowed, in terms of the observations and directions of this Court in the said case. There shall be no order as to costs.

5. Registry is directed to append a copy of the order passed by this court in W.P.No.3449 of 2003 dated 30.09.2016 to this order. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

_______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

Date: 13.07.2026 BSK

Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned

Reportable

Non-reportable ☑

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NO: 18639 OF 2026

Date: 13.07.2026 BSK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead