Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/510/2022 of NADIMINTI MABU Vs P JAGANADH on 9 July 2026
for orders/judgment: - Date of pronouncement: 10-07-2026 Date of uploading : APHC010076632022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 510 OF 2022
Date of reserved for orders/judgment: -
Date of pronouncement: 10-07-2026
Date of uploading :
APHC010076632022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 510 OF 2022
Between:
1. NADIMINTI MABU, S/o Dasthagiri, Aged about 53 years, D.No.
2/156D, Vempalii Road, Yerraguntla Town, Y.S.R. Kadapa District.
...Petitioner
AND
1. P JAGANADH, Working as the Commissioner, Yerraguntla Municipality, Yerraguntla, Y.S.R. Kadapa District.
...Respondent
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971
praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent/contemnor herein under Sections 1C7o 12 of Contempt of Courts Act for wilfully, wantonly and disobediently not implementing the interim order in I.A. No. 1 of 2021 in W.P.No. 18878 of 2021 dated 31.08.2021 passed by His Lordship's BATTU DEVANAND Garu and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: DODDAKA HARSHA VARDHAN
Counsel for the Respondent N RANGA REDDY
The Court made the following order:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 510 OF 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed against the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order, dated 31.08.2021 passed by this Court in W.P.No.18878 of 2021, wherein, this Court directed the respondent therein to maintain Status-quo as on that day, in all respects, with regard to the subject property, pending further orders.
2. During the course of hearing today, Mr.N.Ranga Reddy learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the respondent did not interfere into the possession of the petitioner over the subject house property after interim orders passed by this Court.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also endorsed the same.
4. In view of the above factual position, in our considered view, there is no wilful disobedience on the part of the respondent and this Contempt Case can be closed against him.
5. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.
6. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shall stand closed.
_____________________________
JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Date: 10.07.2026 PKR
Speaking Yes/No / Recorded Yes/No
Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Date: 10.07.2026 PKR