Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/5660/2022 of G.Srinivasarao, Vs Sri Prudvi Raja on 9 July 2026
for orders :-- Date of pronouncement : 10.07.2026 Date of uploading : 11.07.2026 APHC010652592022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO:
Date of reserved for orders :--
Date of pronouncement : 10.07.2026
Date of uploading : 11.07.2026
APHC010652592022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3207]
FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5660/2022
Between:
1. G.SRINIVASARAO,, S/O. SUBBARAO, AGE 48 YEARS, R/ O. H.NO.
3-129, MAIN ROAD, KONAKI VILLAGE, MARTUR MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT
2. SMT. GANJI PUNNAYAMMA,, W/O. MOHANARAO, AGE 65 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 3-109-A, MAIN ROAD, KONAKI VILLAGE, MARTUR
MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. SRI
PRUDVI
RAJA,
THE
MARTUR
GRAMA
PANCHAYAT
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MARTUR MANDAL, BAPATLA
DISTRICT
2. THE TAHSILDAR, MANDAL REVENUE OFFICE, MARTUR, BAPATLA
DISTRICT
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BAPATLA DISTRICT, BAPATLA
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein under Sections 10
to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for wilful, deliberate and intentional violation of orders dated 13-10-2022 in I.A.No. 1/2022 in W.P. No.33525/2022
and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with an extent of 472
square yards in survey No. 604/1 covered by registered sale deed document No. 2479/2011 of Martur Village, Bapatla District and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. P SUBASH
2. V VINOD K REDDY
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Contempt Case No.5660 of 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed complaining the wilful disobedience of the order, dated 13.10.2022 in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.33525 of 2022.
2. During the course of hearing today, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the main Writ Petition itself is dismissed as withdrawn, by order, dated 08.10.2025.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also endorsed the same.
4. In view of the factual position, as already the writ petition itself is dismissed as withdraw, in my considered view, no further adjudication is required in this contempt case.
5. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed.
6. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the case shall stand closed.
____________________________
JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date: 10.07.2026 PGR
Whether the order is :
Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
C.C.No.5660 of 2022
Date: 10.07.2026
PGR