Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/454/2022 of Dr.Smt.K.Sarojini, Vs Mr.N.Kumaraswamy on 9 July 2026
for orders/judgment: - Date of pronouncement: 10-07-2026 Date of uploading : APHC010067672022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 454 OF 2022
Date of reserved for orders/judgment: -
Date of pronouncement: 10-07-2026
Date of uploading :
APHC010067672022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 454 OF 2022
Between:
1. Dr.Smt.K.Sarojini,, W/o Dr.K.Subba Rao, Aged 65 years, Occ- Medical Practitioner, R/o.Plot No.329, Aditya Nagar, Pragathinagar Road, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District-500085, Telangana.
2. K.Madhusudhana Rao, S/o Late Bhaskar Rao, Aged 61 years, Occ- Business, R/o NagulupaduRoad, Near V.V.R.Travels, Ramnagar, Addanki Town and Mandal, Prakasam District.
3. K.Vamsi Krishna, S/o Late Murali Krishna, Aged 39 years, Occ- Business, R/o 5-3, V.Kopperapadu village, Ballikurava Mandal, Prakasam District.
4. K.Gopi Krishna, S/o Late Murali Krishna, Aged 38 years, Occ- Business, R/o Backside Yamaha Showroom, Ramnagar, Addanki Town and Mandal, Prakasam District.
5. Smt.K.Prameela, W/o Late Murali Krishna, Aged 61 years, 0cc- Housewife, R/o Medaramitla Village, Thammavaram Road, Korisapadu Mandal, Prakasam District-523212.
6. Koganti Sai Krishna, S/o Late Murali Krishna, Aged 35 years, Occ- Software Engineer, R/o Plot No.71, Aditya Nagar, Pragathinagar Road, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District-500085, Telangana.
7.
Smt.K.Lakshmi
Siva
Parvathi,
W/o
Anjaiah,
D/o
Smt.K.V.Subbamma, Aged 57 years, 0cc- Housewife, R/o Plot
No.83, Tulasi Nagar, Near Jeevana Jyothi High School, Allwyn Colony Phase-2, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District-500072, Telangana.
...Petitioners
AND
1. Mr N Kumaraswamy, , Panchayat Secretary, Vaidena Kopperapadu Gram Panchayat, Ballikurava Mandal, Prakasam District-523303.
2. Bandaru Sivaiah, S/o Late China Kotaiah, Aged 59 years, Occ- Cultivation, R/o H.No.2-60, V.Kopperapadu Village, Ballikurava Mandal, Prakasam District-523303.
3. Bandaru Nagaraju, S/o Late China Kotaiah, Aged 55 years, Occ- Cultivation, R/o H.No.2-60, V.Kopperapadu Village, Ballikurava Mandal, Prakasam District-523303.
...Respondents
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Contemnors/Respondents under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willfully and deliberately floating the orders of this Hon'ble High Court passed in I.A.No. 1 of 2021 in W.P.No. 23027 of 2021, dated 08-10-2021 and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: SRICHARAN TELAPROLU
Counsel for the Respondents: M R S SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents:V VINOD K REDDY (SC FOR ZP MPDO GP)
The Court made the following order:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 454 OF 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order, dated 08.10.2021 passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2021 in W.P.No.23027 of 2021, wherein, this Court directed the respondents therein to maintain Status-quo as on that day, in all respects, with regard to the subject property, pending further orders.
2. During the course of hearing today, learned counsel for the respondents submits that after filing of this Contempt Case, the respondent Nos.2 & 3 stopped construction. The respondent No.1 took steps to stop further construction by the respondent Nos.2 & 3.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners also endorsed the same stating that further construction is stopped in compliance with the order of this Court.
4. In view of the same, in our considered view, there is no wilful disobedience on the part of the respondents in this Contempt Case.
5. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.
6. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shall stand closed.
_____________________________
JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Date: 10.07.2026 PKR
Speaking Yes/No / Recorded Yes/No
Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Date: 10.07.2026 PKR