Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/2117/2026 of CHEEPATI JEELANI BASHA Vs THE UNION OF INDIA on 9 July 2026
for orders : -- Date of pronouncement : 10.07.2026 Date of uploading : 10.07.2026 APHC010033072026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO:
Date of reserved for orders : --
Date of pronouncement : 10.07.2026
Date of uploading : 10.07.2026
APHC010033072026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 2117/2026
Between:
1. CHEEPATI JEELANI BASHA, S/O LATE CHEEPATI. MOHAMMED
HANEEF, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC CHIEF LOCO
INSPECTOR, R/O 13/ 183-C-12-B,VIJAY NAGAR COLONY, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 515801
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL
MANAGER, SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, RAIL NILAYAM, SECUNDERABAD - 500 071. 2.
2. THE DIVISIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, TRSO/NED DA
SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, NANDED DIVISION, NANDED, MAHARASHTRA-400104 3.
3. SHRI P VEERABHADHRA RAO, EI/HQ, INQUIRY OFFICER, SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, RAIL NILAYAM, SECUNDERABAD- 500003
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly Respondent No.2 in issuing impugned order vide Ref. No.GTL/V/2015030021/M-01/16-17/JB, dt.23.12.2025 by appointing Respondent No.3 as an Inquiry Officer to conduct a departmental enquiry on charges which are sub-judice in a pending criminal case. vide C.C No. 20 of 2022 on the file of the court of the Special Court for CBI Cases, Kurnool, A.P as illegal, arbitrary, and colourable exercise of power and violative of Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution of India, the principles of natural justice, and the settled law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court and this Hon’ble Court.
Consequently Set-Aside the impugned order vide Ref. No. GTL/V/
2015030021/ M-01/16-17/JB, dt.23.12.2025 issued the Respondent No.2
and to direct the 2nd respondent not to proceed with the departmental enquiry in pursuance of the charge memo dated 2.5.01.2016 till the conclusion of the trial in C.C No.20 of 2022 on the file of the court of the Special Court for CBI Cases, Kurnool AP and accordingly to grant all consequential reliefs and pass such other orders.
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned order vide Ref.No.GTL/V/2015030021/M-01/16-17/JB, dated 23.12.2025 issued by the Respondent No.2 and to direct the Respondents more particularly Respondent No.2 not to proceed with the departmental enquiry in pursuance of the charge memo dated 25.01.2016, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other orders.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KHAJA KHUTUBUDDIN SHAIK
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. NARASIMHARAO GUDISEVA (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL)
The Court made the following:
WRIT PETITION No.2117 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the appointment of Respondent No.3 as an Enquiry Officer pending criminal case vide C.C.No.20 of 2022 on the file of the Special Court for CBI Cases, Kurnool.
2. In this case, the Petitioner is an employee of South Central Indian Railways and the issue urged by the Petitioner in this case is relating to Central Administrative Tribunal.
3. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the Petitioner to raise his plea before appropriate Court for redressal of his grievance.
4. No costs.
5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
Date: 10.07.2026
IS
Speaking
Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable
WRIT PETITION No.2117 of 2026 Dated: 10.07.2026
IS