Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1566/2026 of K Sandeep Naidu, Vs Sri Peeyush Kumar, on 9 July 2026
for orders : Date of pronouncement : 10.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010190062026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1566/2026 Between: 1.
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement : 10.07.2026
Date of uploading :
APHC010190062026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1566/2026
Between:
1. K SANDEEP NAIDU,, S/O K RAVI PRAKASH NAIDU, AGED ABOUT
37 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O NANDYAL TOWN, NANDYAL
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI
PEEYUSH
KUMAR,
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
FINANCE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. -522237
2. SMT
RAJAKUMARI
GANIYA,
THE
DISTRICT
COLLECTOR,
NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. -518501
3. B
SESHANNA,
COMMISSIONER,
NANYALA
MUNICIPALITY,NANDYAL,
NANDYAL
DISTRICT
ANDHRA
PRADESH. -518501
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Contemners/ Respondents in the W.P
No. 30714 of 2025 for gross, deliberate and wilful violation of the final order dated 06.11.2025 in W.P No. 30714 of 2025 on the file of the Hon'ble High
Court of Andhra Pradesh, under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. AYESHA AZMA S
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:-
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.30714 of 2025, dated 06.11.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
10.07.2026 PNS
Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ☑