Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/427/2009 of TUMMALACHERUVU MADHAVA RAO Vs RACHAKULLA ANANDA KRISHNA KUMARI @ KRISHNA KUMARI & 3 OTHERS on 9 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 427/2009 Between: 1. TUMMALACHERUVU MADHAVA RAO, S/O LATE HANUMANTHA RAO, R/O 1-45-8,
APHC010644062009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 427/2009
Between:
1. TUMMALACHERUVU MADHAVA RAO, S/O LATE HANUMANTHA
RAO, R/O 1-45-8, MAMIDIBATTULAVARI STREET, NAZARPET, TENALI TOWN,
...PETITIONER
AND
1. RACHAKULLA ANANDA KRISHNA KUMARI KRISHNA KUMARI 3
OTHERS, W/O NAGESWARA RAO, C/O MACHALA KAMALA
KUMARI, 3RD LINE, ANKKAMMA NAGAR, GUNTUR CITY.
2. RACHAKULLA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O MAYABRAHMAM, C/O
MACHALA KAMALA KUMARI, 3RD LINE, ANKKAMMA NAGAR, GUNTUR CITY.
3. T SRINIVASA RAO, S/O ROSAIAH, R/O NEAR TOWN P.S., PONNUR, GUNTUR CITY.
4. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH
COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto file this Crl.R.C., against the Order passed by the learned I Addl. Judl. First Class Magistrate, Tenali, dated 20.12.08 in C.F.R.No.225 of 2008 in Cr.No.112 of 2007 of Tenali I Town P.S., Guntur Dist.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 427/2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. Instant criminal revision has been preferred against the order dated 20.12.2008 passed by learned I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Tenali in C.F.R. No.225 of 2008 in Crime No.112 of 2007 of Tenali I town police station.
2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
3. During pendency of the revision, pursuant to the direction of this Court, dated 30.06.2025, the Station House Officer, Tenali I Town Police Station, has placed on record the status report of the petitioner, which reads as follows: “…this is private complaint filed by the complainant and court endorsed report that occurred on 12.07.2006 at 18.00 hrs at Thotavarı Street, Ramalingeswararaopet, Tenali Town, Guntur and reported on 17.10.2007 at 11.00 hrs in which the complainant Tummalacheruvu Madhavarao S/o.Hanumantharao (late)
Yrs, D.No:1-45-8, Mamidabattulavari Street, Nazaepet, Tenali, Guntur stated that the accused 1) Rachakulla Ananda Krishna Kumari @ Krishnakumari W/o Nageswararao, 32 yrs, C/o Machalla Kamalakumari, 3rd lane, Ankamma Nagar, Guntur, (2) Rachakulla Nageswararao, S/o Brahmam, 40 yrs, C/o Machalla Kamalakumari, 3rd lane, Ankamma Nagar, Guntur, (3) Thota Srinivasarao S/o Rosaiah, 37 Yrs, D.No:21- 15-9/5, Thotavari Street, Ramalingeswarapet, Tenalı, Guntur, that the accused taken away cash Rs.4,57,000/- belongs to the complainant with dire consequence and on the intervention of the other they ran away for necessary action.
During the Course of the investigation the case was referred as a FALSE on 30.10 2007
It is further submitted that, the complainant Tummalacheruvu Madhva Rao S/o Late Hamunamtha Rao died and no one is available to get his death certificate in his house. His house is in locked condition. Requisition was sent to Municipal office, Tenali for Death Certificate of the Tummalacheruvu Madhavarao, S/o Hanumantharao (late). ….”
4. It appears from the record that learned Magistrate, while dealing with the application of the petitioner under Sections 190 and 200 Cr.P.C. for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 420, 379, 448, 323, 506 read with 34 of IPC is of the view that, there are no materials to take cognizance of the complaint on file for the alleged offences. Accordingly, the said complaint was dismissed under Section 203 Cr.P.C. by passing the impugned order.
5. The status report of the Station House Officer, Tenali I Town Police Station suggests that the petitioner has expired.
6. Since the petitioner has passed away, nothing would survive for consideration regarding the legality, correctness, or propriety of the impugned order. Consequently, the criminal revision case is dismissed as infructuous.
7. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal revision case shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA BV
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No