Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/18235/2026 of P SREERAMULU Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 9 July 2026
reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 10-07-2026 Date of uploading : APHC010341582026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 18235/2026
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement : 10-07-2026
Date of uploading
:
APHC010341582026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 18235/2026
Between:
P Sreeramulu
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KAMBYAGARI SAIPRATAP
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES I
2. MALLIKHARJUNA MOORTHY K (SC FOR A.P HOUSING
CORPORATION LIMITED)
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
W.P.No.18235 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
The present writ petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondents in not paying the encashment of leave as sanctioned by respondent no. 4 to the Petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that though the Petitioner had retired in the year 2024 as General Manager (Finance) in A.P. State Housing Corporation Limited, the encashment of leave as sanctioned by Respondent No. 4 was not disbursed.
3. Sri A. Mallikarjuna Murthy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondents, passed on the written instructions dated 09.07.2026 signed by the General Manager (Admn-FAC) and submits that the leave encashment granted to the Petitioner was uploaded vide Bill No. 2025-8087 for Rs. 20,05,860/- with revised DA, and the said bill was approved by the treasury authorities and thereafter, the same was rejected and returned due to the year- ending activity. He further submits that the bill shall be re-uploaded as and when the relevant file is enabled in the NIDHI Portal for payment from the budget provision of 2026-2027.
4. As there is no dispute with regard to the claim of the Petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:
i) The Respondent Authorities are directed to disburse the admitted amounts in the Written Statement within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.
ii) There shall be no order as to costs. The Written Instructions of the General Manager, dated 09.07.2026 are placed on record. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
__________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 10.07.2026 eha
Whether the order is: Speaking
Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
W.P.No.18235 of 2026 Dated: 10.07.2026
eha