Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/15754/2008 of C. VARADHAIAH NAIDU, CHITTOOR DIST. Vs THE D.R. / D.C.O., CHITTOOR DIST. & 3 ANO. on 9 July 2026
for orders : Date of pronouncement :10.07.2026 Date of uploading : 17.07.2026 APHC010416222008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO:
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement :10.07.2026
Date of uploading : 17.07.2026
APHC010416222008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 15754/2008
Between:
1. C. VARADHAIAH NAIDU, CHITTOOR DIST., S/O. MUNASWAMY
NAIDU EX-PRESIDENT, THODATHARA P.A.C.S., THAVANAMPALLE
MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTIRCT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE D R / D C O CHITTOOR DIST 3 ANO, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR
DISTRICT.
2. THE CHITTOOR DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR
DISTRICT,
REP.
BY
ITS
GENERAL
MANAGER.
3. A K PRABHAKARA REDDY, S/O. KRISHNA REDDY SECRETARY
(UNDER SUSPENSION), R/O. EGUVA THAVANAMPALLE VILLAGE, THAVANAMPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
4. THE A P COOPERATIVE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD REP BY ITS, SECRETARY, 7TH FLOOR, CHANDRAVIHAR BUILDING COMPLEX, M.J.ROAD, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in C.T.A.No. 58 of 2005
and the orders dated 09.04.2008 on the file of the A.P.Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad, and the orders passed by the 1st respondnet in his proceedings in
Rc.No. 279/2001-B, dated 20.12.2003 and quash them as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust, violative of rule of natural justice and against the provisions of A.P.Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP 20409 OF 2008
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the orders of the A.P.Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad in C.T.A. No. 58 of 2005, dt. 09.04.2008, conmfirming the proceedings of the of the 1st respondent in Rc.No. 279/2001-B, dt.
20.12.2003, pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S V MUNI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K KISHOR KUMAR REDDY
2. SRINIVAS POLAVARAPU
3. GP FOR COOPERATION
WRIT PETITION NO: 16039/2008
Between:
1. C. VARADHAIAH NAIDU, CHITTOOR DIST., S/O. MUNASWAMY
NAIDU EX. PRESIDENT, THODATHARA P.A.C.S THAVANAMPALLE
MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE DY REGISTRAR/DIVISIONAL COOP OFFICER 2 OTHERS, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
2. THE A P COOPERATIVE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD REP BY ITS, SECRETARY, 7TH FLOOR, CHANDRAVIHAR BUILDING COMPLEX, M.J. ROAD, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD.
3. A K PRABHAKARA REDDY, S/O. KRISHNA REDDY SECRETARY
(UNDER
SUSPENSION)
AGED
YRS
R./O.
EGUVA
THAVANAMPALLE
VILLAGE,
THAVANAMPALLE
MANDAL,
CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the records in C.T.A.No. 1 of 2006
and the Orders dt. 9-4-2008 on the file of the A.P. Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad and the Orders passed by the 1st Respondent in his proceedings in Rc No. 279/2001-B dt. 20-12-2003 and quash them as being illegal, arbitrary unjust violative of rule of natural justice and against the Provisions of A.P. Cooperative Societies Act 1964 and to pass such other and further orders IA NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP 20482 OF 2008
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the Certified copies of CTA No. 1/2006 of the 2nd respondent Proceedings in Rc No. 279/2001-B dt. 20-12-2003 of the 1st Respondent and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S V MUNI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP)
2. GP FOR COOPERATION
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER:-
Learned counsel for the petitioner represented that the petitioner died. Learned counsel further submits that as per his information, the deceased was not survived by any legal heirs.
2. The representation made by learned counsel for the petitioner is recorded.
3. Recording the said submission, the writ petitions are dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 10.07.2026 ANI
Whether the order is: Speaking ✓ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ✓
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NOs:15754 and 16039 of 2008
Dated: 10.07.2026
ANI