Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/4910/2012 of The Kadapa District NGO's Cooperative House Building Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its on 9 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

for orders : Date of pronouncement : 10-07-2026 Date of uploading : 15-07-2026 APHC010047452012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO:

Date of reserved for orders :

Date of pronouncement : 10-07-2026

Date of uploading : 15-07-2026

APHC010047452012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NO: 4910/2012

Between:

1. THE KADAPA DISTRICT NGO'S COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING, SOCIETY LTD, KADAPA REP BY ITS PRESIDENT M. VIJAYA

BHASKAR REDDY

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND COOPERATION (VIII)

DEPT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD

2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR COOPERATION AND REGISTRAR OF, COOPERATIVE

SOCIETIES,

GOVERNMENT

OF

ANDHRA

HYDERABAD

3. THE

DISTRICT

COOPERATIVE

OFFICER,

KADAPA,

KADAPA

DISTRICT

4. SRI BANDARU GOPALA SWAMY EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, REP BY

ITS CORRESPONDENT B. GOPAL SWAMY NGO'S COLONY, KADAPA

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue an appropriate writ order or direction more one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order/proceedings of the 2nd Respondent issued in Rc.No. 1376/2004-HSG.2, dt. 15.12.2005 and the order passed by

the 1st respondent-Government in Memo No. 281/CH(1)/06-2 dt. 9.5.2007 as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 6270 OF 2012

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the proceedings of the 2nd Respondent in Rc.No. 1376/2004-HSG.2, dt. 15.12.2005 pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. PONNADA SREE VYAS

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR COOPERATION

2. DHEERA KANISHKA

3. A V S LAXMI

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:-

It has been stated by learned counsel for the respondents that the cause raised in the writ petition would not survive.

2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.

______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 10.07.2026 ANI

Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned

Reportable

Non-reportable ☑

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NO:4910 of 2012

Dated: 10.07.2026

ANI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead