Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/9183/2026 of NIDIGUNTA ADI LAKSHMI Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 8 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010181122026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 9 THE HONOURABLE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 9183/2026 Between: 1. NIDIGUNTA ADI LAKSHMI, W/O

Date of reserved for orders :

Date of pronouncement :

Date of uploading :

APHC010181122026

IN THE H

(

THURSD

THE HONOURAB

THE HONOURABL

WRIT

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. NIDIGUNTA ADI LAK ABOUT 60 YEARS, TEMPLE STREET, DISTRICT

1. THE STATE OF SECRETARY TO G DEPARTMENT. SEC 522503

2. THE DISTRICT COLL 524001.

3. THE SUPERINTEND DISTRICT, 524003

4. THE SUPERINTENDE DT. 516002

5. THE SUPERINTEND HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) DAY, THE 9th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHAR LE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUM

T PETITION NO: 9183/2026 SHMI, W/O NIDIGUNTA NARASIMHUL OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O 2/119,POL PEDDA PADUGUPADU, SPSR ...PE AND ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS GOVERNMENT GENERAL ADMINIS CRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR D LECTOR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE D ENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, SPSR ENT, CENTRAL PRISIOON,KADAPA , DENT OF PRISONS, SPECIAL PRIS

[3601] RI MAR LU, AGED LERAMMA NELLORE TITIONER S CHIEF STRATION DISTRICT. DISTRICT, NELLORE KADAPA SON FOR

WOMEN, KAAPA, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 516002

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Habeas Corpus declaring action of the Respondents for the continued solitary confinement of the detenu by name Nidigunta Aruna D/o N.Narasimhulu Aged about 31 years R/o 2/119, Poleramma Temple Street, Pedda Padugupadu, SPSR Nellore District, since 10 days at the 4TH and 5TH Respondent Prison as illegal, arbitrary, in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and unconstitutional and consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith release the detenu by name Nidigunta Aruna D/o N.Narasimhulu Aged about 31 years R/o 2/119, Poleramma Temple Street, Pedda Padugupadu, SPSR Nellore District from solitary confinement, be treated medically for mental trauma and award a cost of Rupees 10 lakhs and be pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the Respondent to forthwith release the detenu by name Nidigunta Aruna D/o N.Narasimhulu Aged about 31 years R/o 2/119, Poleramma Temple Street, Pedda Padugupadu, SPSR Nellore District from solitary confinement and be pleased to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the Respondents to facilitate medical treatment of the detenu by name Nidigunta Aruna D/o N.Narasimhulu Aged about 31 years R/o 2/119, Poleramma Temple Street, Pedda Padugupadu, SPSR Nellore District for mental trauma suffered in the solitary confinement, in the presence of family members and be pleased to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SYED KHADER MASTAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR

WRIT PETITION NO: 9183/2026 ORDER: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J)

Heard Sri Syed Khader Masthan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Keerthi Teja Kondaveeti, learned Government Pleader attached to the office of learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has been rendered infructuous and the petition be dismissed as infructuous.

3. Learned Government Pleader for the respondents has no objection

4. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.

___________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J

_____________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI,J

Dated:09.07.2026 AG

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR

WRIT PETITION NO: 9183/2026

Dated:09.07.2026 AG

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead