WP/18367/2012 of K. Surya Kumari, Vs Union of India, on 8 July 2026

1. K. SURYA KUMARI,, D/O. LATE GOVINDACHARYULU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 5-7/8-56/23, DEENADAYAL NAGAR, I - TOWN, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, SC RAILWAYS, RAIL NILAYAM, SECUNDERABAD.

2. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER, VIJAYAWADA DIVISION, SCR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRTICT.

3. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL PERSONNEL OFFICER, VIJAYAWADA DIVISION, SCR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for records in OA No. 1901 of 2009 on the file of the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and quash the order dated 24.02.2012 and consequently declare that the petitioner is eligible and entitled for the family pension with all the arrears from the date of application for family pension after setting aside the order dtd dt. 05.08.2009 issued by respondent No3 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 23079 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to make Union of India, Rep. by its General Manager, South Central Railways, secunderabad as repsondent No. 1 in the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2012(WPMP 23520 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the family pension to the petitioner under proceedigns dt. 18.09.2007 from May 2012 and pass IA NO: 5 OF 2012(WPMP 101211 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 180227 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K S MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. MALLAMPALLI SRINIVAS(CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL)

2. E SAMBASIVA PRATAP The Court made the following:

ORDER :-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

The matter pertains to the year 2012 and is listed in the “Weekly Cause-list”

2. No representation for the petitioner, even in the revised call.

3. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed „for want of prosecution‟.

No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J

_____________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI, J Date : 09.07.2026. RPD.

Whether the order is : Speaking ✔ Yes/ No Reasoned

Yes/ No Reportable

Yes/ No Non-Reportable ✔ Yes/ No

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI

(DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION)

WRIT PETITION NO: 18367 of 2012

Date: 09.07.2026

RPD.