Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/32164/2012 of SENIOR DIV.RAILWAY MANAGER,VSP,AND 3 Vs DEEMUDU,VSP on 8 July 2026
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA I.A. No.2 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO: 32164 OF 2012 I.A. No.2
APHC010048312012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
I.A. No.2 OF 2024
IN
WRIT PETITION NO: 32164 OF 2012
I.A. No.2 OF 2024
Between:
1.
Senior
Divisional
Railway
Manager,
East
Coast
Railways,
Waltair
Visakhapatnam.
2.
The
Additional
Senior
Divisional,
Railway
Manager,
East
Coast
Railway, Visakhapatnam.
3.
The
Chief
Commercial
manager.
East
Coast
Railway,
Chandrashekarpur Bhuvaneswar, Orissa State.
4.
The Union of India, rep.by
Its General manager, East Coast Railway, Bhuvaneshwar, Orissa State.
...Petitioners/Petitioners
AND
w
Deemudu VSP, Occ: Ex.CTIII, Visakhapatnam East Coast Railway, Waltair R/o. H.No. 44, 209/8 Railway New Colony Visakhapatnam.
...Respondents/Respondents
Petition under Order 9 Rule 9 of CPC
praying that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set-aside the dismissal for non-prosecution order Dt.25-07-2024 in W.P.No.32164/2012 and restore the same.
WRIT PETITION NO: 32164 OF 2012
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling the records relating to the OA No. 240/2010 dated 11.07.2012 on the file of Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and set aside the same and confirm the punishment of compulsory retirement passed by the respondent No.1
vide
Punishment
Notice
No.
WAT/G/MAJOR/COMMI_/VSKP /08/741
/573 Dated 05.01.2009 and
further
confirmed
by
the
appellate
authorities
and
revisional
authorities
i.e
respondents 2 and 3.
lA NO: 1 OF 2012fWPMP 41000 OF 2012
Petition under Section 151 CPC
praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to forthwith suspend the order dated 11.07.2012 in OA 240/2010 on the file of Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI PRABHAKAR PERI
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI VENKATESWERLLU KESAMSETTY
The Court made the following order:
Considering the submissions, this interlocutory Application is allowed and the Writ Petition is restored to file.
Sd/- M. SRINIVAS
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. One CC to Sri Yosyula Bhaskara Rao, Advocate (OPUC)
One CC to
Sri Prabhakar Peri, Advocate [OPUC]
OneCC to Sri Venkateswerllu Kesamsetty, Advocate [OPUC]
Two CD Copies
2.
3.
4.
Cnr
▼
HIGH COURT
Cnr
DATED:04/08/2025
LIST THE MATTER ON
01.09.2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
I.A. No.2 of 2024 in WP NO. 32164 OF 2012 ^ 0 7 AUG 2025 intSectio]^^ ALLOWING THE I.A. No.2 of 2024 RESTORED THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS