WP/35852/2025 of Chintalapati Ravindra Varma, Vs IDBI Bank Limited, on 8 July 2026

1. VANAPALLI USHA OCC BUSINESS, GODAVARI DISTRI

1. IDBI BANK LIMITE 11, K.S.R PLAZ AUTHORISED SIGN

2. CENTRAL BUREA INVESTIGATION O DISTRICT. W.P.No s : :09.07.2026 :16.07.2026 E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SDAY, THE 9th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL ETITION NO: 19501/2025 along with 510, 21010, 21014, 28529 32978, 330 0, 35778, 35833, 35850, 35852 & 359 A RANI, W/O LEELA PRASAD, AG R/O 6-78, REDDY STREET, AKI ICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 534235 AND ED, RAJAHMUNDRY BRANCH, DO ZA, DANAVAIPETA, REPRESEN NATORY U OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESE OFFICER VISAKHAPATNAM, VIS ...RES RC,J .19501 of 2025 & batch DESH

LAPATI

006, 33042,

GE 38 YEARS, VIDU, WEST ...PETITIONER OOR NO.46-22- NTED BY ITS NTED BY ITS SAKAPATNAM SPONDENT(S):

RC,J

pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus a. Declare the action of the Respondent No.1 in not releasing the original documents/ title deeds of the Petitioner property as described in Schedule by the Petitioner after issuing No Dues Letter dated 04.04.2025as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of the Petitioner's rights under Article 14,19,21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. b. Direct the Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners c.and to pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.1 & Respondent No.2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the Petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

WRIT PETITION No.19508 of 2025 Between:

1. ALLURI VIJAYA RAMA RAJU, S/O A. SATYANRARAYANA RAJU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O DOOR NO.2-22- 1/105, BHAGYA NAGAR STREET,

SHANTI APARTMENTS, KUKATPALLI, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT TELANGANA

RC,J

2. MALLAREDDY RAVI SEKHAR, , S/O M.ATCHUTA RAO, AGED ABOUT

YEARS, OCC BUSINESS,

R/O D.NO.1-88-1, BHUVVANPALLI VILLAGE, DAMARRU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. IDBI BANK LIMITED, RAJAHMUNDRY BRANCH, DOORNO.46-22-11, K.S.R PLAZA, DANAVAIPETA,

REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY

2. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIFATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATION OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKAPATNAM DISTRICT.

pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus Declare the action of the Respondent No.1 in not releasing the original documents/ title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners after issuing No Dues Letter dated 04.04.2025as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of the Petitioner's rights under Article 14,19,21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. a. b. Direct the Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners and to pass such in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

RC,J

Between:

1. THIRUMALA RAMESH, NS/O NAGESHWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O CHINA KAPAVARAM, AKIVIDU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

2. GUBBALA NARAYANA SWAMY, S/O RANGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS OCC BUSINESS, D. NO.5-75, CHINA KAPAVARAM, AKIVIDU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADES ...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. IDBI BANK LIMITED, RAJAHMUNDRY BRANCH, DOOR NO.46-22- 11, K.S.R PLAZA, DANAVAIPETA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY

2. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIFATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATION OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKAPATNAM DISTRICT.

pleased to in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus: Declare the action of the Respondent No.1 in not releasing the original documents/ title deeds of the Petitioners a. property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners after issuing No Dues Letter dated 04.04.2025as RC,J

being arbitrary, illegal and violative of the Petitioner's rights under Article 14,19,21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. b. Direct the Respondent No.1 & Respondent No.2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

Between:

1. DAKE SUDARSHAN RAO, S/O MAHANKALI, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O D NO. 2-166,LLLAPAKURRU, YELAMANCHILI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND

1. IDBI BANK LIMITED, RAJAHMUNDRY BRANCH, DOOR NO.46-22- 11, K.S.R PLAZA, DANAVAIPETA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY

2. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATING OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM

pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus a. Declare the action of the Respondent No.1 in not releasing RC,J

the original documents/ title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners after issuing No Dues Letter dated 04.04.2025 as being arbitrary, illegal ana violative of the Petitioner's rights under Article 14,19,21 and 300Aof the Constitution of India. b. Direct the Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners. c. and to pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.1 & Respondent No.2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

Between:

1. KASA KRISHNA VEERA RAGHAVULU,, S/O SURYA PRAKASH RAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O D NO. 3- 128,LLLAPAKURRU, YELAMANCHILI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

2. PAIDI RAM BABU,, S/O DHARMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS OCC- BUSINESS,

D. NO. 1-200/1 ,SIRAGALAPALLI VILLAGE,YELAMANCHILI MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

RC,J

3. BOKKA TATA RAO, , S/O NAGABHUSHANAM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS OCC - BUSINESS

D NO.5-51/1 ,GUMPARU VIILAGE,YELAMANCHILI MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

4. SIRRA NAGENDRA PRASAD ,, S/O SUBBA RAO AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS OCC- BUSINESS

D NO.4- 82/1,LLLAPAKURRU,YELAMANCHILI MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

5. KUNCHE SRINIVASA RAO, , S/O MOHAN RAO AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS OCC- BUSINESS

D NO.4- 14/2,LLLAPAKURRU,YEIAMANCHILI MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. IDBI BANK LIMITED, RAJAHMUNDRY BRANCH, DOOR NO.46-22- 11, K.S.R PLAZA, DANAVAIPETA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY

2. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATING OFFICER, VISHAKAPATNAM

pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus a) Declare the action of the Respondent No.1 in not releasing the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners after issuing No Dues Letter dated 04.04.2025 as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of the Petitioner's rights under Article 14,19,21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. b. Direct the Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners

c. pass such other order or orders as this Flon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case SCHEDULE OF DOCUMENTS a)

RC,J

Document No.2735/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial and Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1400 Sq. yards, consisting of 7 plots i.e Plot No.297,298,366,367,444,445 and 446 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 and 737 situated at Idea City-Pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.3 b. Document No. 1870/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial and Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1573 Sq. yards, consisting of 7 plots i.e Plot No.555 to 558, 576 to 578 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 and 737 situated at Idea City-pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.3 c) Document No.2738/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial and Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1333 Sq. yards, consisting of 6 plots i.e Plot No.425 to 430 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 and 737 situated at Idea City-pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.4 d) Document No. 1895/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial and Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1333 Sq. yards, consisting of 10 plots i.e Plot No.456 to 458,Plot No.462 to 468 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 and 737 situated at Idea City-pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.4 e) Document No.1873/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial and Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 2163 Sq. yards, consisting of 9 plots i.e Plot No.546,547,Plot No.550 to 553,Plot No.563 to 565 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 and 737 situated at Idea City- pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.5 f) Document No.1871/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial and Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 2066 Sq. yards, consisting of 9 plots i.e Plot No.566 to 568,Plot No.679 to 682,Plot No.717 to 718 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 and 737 situated at Idea City- pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.2 g) Document No.2736/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial and Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1402 Sq. yards, consisting of 7 plots i.e Plot No.431 to 437 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 and 737 situated at Idea City-pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.2 h) Document No.1872/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial and Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 2292 Sq.

RC,J

yards, consisting of 9 plots i.e Plot No.569 to 570,Plot No.573 to 575,Plot No.585 to 586,Plot No. 591 to 592 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 and 737 situated at Idea City-pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.1 i) Document No.2737/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial and property 1373 Sq. yards, consisting of 6 plots i.e Plot No.438 to 443 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 and l, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.1

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.1 & Respondent No.2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the Petitioners and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in interest of justice. SCHEDULE OF DOCUMENTS a) Document No.2735/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial & Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1400 Sq. yards, consisting of 7 plots i.e Plot No.297,298,366,367,444,445 and 446 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 & 737 situated at Idea City-Pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.3

b) Document No.1870/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial & Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1573 Sq. yards, consisting of 7 plots i.e Plot No.555 to 558, 576 to 578 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 & 737 situated at Idea City-pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.3 c) Document No.2738/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial & Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1333 Sq. yards, consisting of 6 plots i.e Plot No.425 to 430 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 & 737 situated at Idea City-pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.4 d) Document No.1895/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial & Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1333 Sq. yards, consisting of 10 plots i.e Plot No.456 to 458,Plot No.462 to 468 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 & 737 situated at Idea City- pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.4 e) Document No. 1873/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial & Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 2163 Sq.

RC,J

yards, consisting of 9 plots i.e Plot No.546,547,Plot No.550 to 553,Plot No.563 to 565 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 & 737 situated at Idea City- pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.5 f) Document No.1871/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial & Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 2066 Sq. yards, consisting of 9 plots i.e Plot No.566 to 568,Plot No.679 to 682,Plot No.717 to 718 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 & 737 situated at Idea City- pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.2 g) Document No.2736/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial & Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1402 Sq. yards, consisting of 7 plots i.e Plot No.431 to 437 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 & 737 situated at Idea City-pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.2 h) Document No. 1872/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial & Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 2292 Sq. yards, consisting of 9 plots i.e Plot No.569 to 570,Plot No.573 to 575,Plot No.585 to 586,Plot No. 591 to 592 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 & 737 situated at Idea City-pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.1

i) Document No.2737/2010 pertaining to E.M of Commercial & Residential Land admeasuring total extent of immovable property 1373 Sq. yards, consisting of 6 plots i.e Plot No.438 to 443 in R.S.NO.707,708, 711,712, 736 & 737 situated at Idea City-pochampalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana belonging to Petitioner No.1 Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

Between:

1. VEGESNA VENKATA SATYA KANAKA DURGA NAGA SOMA RAJU @ AIRTEL SOMARAJU @ PANDU, S/O SUNDARA RAMARAJU, RC,J

AGED 62 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS, R/O MAHADEVAPATNAM, UNDI MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT.

2. VEGESNA SARASWATHI, W/O VEGESNA VENKATA SATYA KANAKA DURGA NAGA SOMA RAJU @ AIRTEL SOMARAJU @ PANDU, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS, R/O MAHADEVAPATNAM, UNDI MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE IDBI BANK LIMITED, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER AND SENIOR REGIONAL HEAD, I FLOOR, PYDA CHAMBERS, VIP ROAD, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM-530003.

2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, IDBI PALANGI BRANCH, TANUKU MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT.

3. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATING OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM.

pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the respondents action in not returning the original title deeds (Doc. No. 2971/2011 dated 26-07- 2011, Doc. No. 940/2011 dated 23-07-2011, and Doc. No. 3588/2011 dated 29- 08-2011) as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, and 300- of the Constitution of India consequently, to direct the respondents to return the said title deeds to the petitioners by releasing the Mortgage deeds at relevant SROs forthwith and pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining the documents and to pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to return the original title deeds (Doc. No. 2971/2011

RC,J

dated 26- 07-2011, Doc. No. 940/2011 dated 23-07-2011, and Doc. No. 3588/2011 dated 29-08-2011) to the petitioners by releasing the Mortgage deeds at relevant SRO's forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. JAMI MADHAVI

Between:

1. SMT. JHANSI LAKSHMI INDUKURI, W/O SURYANARAYANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O FLAT NO.203, LOTUS ARNET APARTMENTS, ASR NAGAR, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND

1. THE IDBI BANK LIMITED, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER AND REGIONAL HEAD, RETAIL BANKING GROUP, REGIONAL OFFICE, IDBI BANK LIMITED, AP, FIRST FLOOR, PYDAH CHAMBERS, VIP ROAD, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530003.

2. THE BRANCH MANAGER / AUTHORISED OFFICER, IDBI BANK LIMITED, BHIMAVARAM BRANCH, DOOR NO. 22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

3. CENTRAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATING OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM.

RC,J

pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents, particularly respondent Nos.1 and 2, in not returning my original title deed (Doc.No.3788 of 1992 dated 24-08-1992 of SRO Tallarevu) pertaining to Ac.01.35 cents in R.S.No.260, Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District even after closure of the loan accounts, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19(1 K9). 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and contrary to the law declared by the Honble Apex Court and various Honble High Courts including this Honble Court, apart from the principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents to return the original title deed (Doc.No.3788 of 1992 dated 24-08-1992 of SRO Tallarevu) to me forthwith and to pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining my documents and to pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the mortgage and return the original title deed (Doc.No.3788 of 1992 dated 24-08- 1992 of SRO Tallarevu) pertaining to Ac.01.35 cents in R.S.No.260, Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District to me forthwith by directing the respondents to pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining the documents; pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. JAMI MADHAVI

RC,J

Between:

1. I P R MOHAN RAJU, S/O JANAKIRAMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS, R/O VILLA NO.33, JAYABHERI TEMPLE TREE, NANAKRAMGUDA, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER AND

1. THE IDBI BANK LIMITED, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER AND REGIONAL HEAD, RETAIL BANKING GROUP, REGIONAL OFFICE, IDBI BANK LIMITED, AP, FIRST FLOOR, PYDAH CHAMBERS, VIP ROAD, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530003.

2. THE BRANCH MANAGER / AUTHORISED OFFICER, IDBI BANK LIMITED, BHIMAVARAM BRANCH, DOOR NO. 22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

3. CENTRAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATING OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM.

pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents particularly respondent Nos.1 and 2, in not releasing the mortgage and not returning my original title deed vide sale deed bearing Document No.787/1992 dated 06- 04-1992 of SRO Tallarevu (pertaining to Ac. 0.65 cents in R.S.No.260 covered under Doc.No.3786/1992 Ac. 0.184 cents in R.S.No.213/2A/1 covered under Doc.No.787/1992, both situated at Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District, even after closure of the loan accounts, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19(1 )(g), 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and contrary to the law declared by the Honble Apex Court and various Honble High Courts including this Honble Court, apart RC,J

from the principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents to relase the mortgage and return the original title deed sale deed bearing Document No.787/1992 dated 06-04 1992 of SRO Tallarevu, to me forthwith and to pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining my documents and to pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the mortgage and return the original title deed sale deed bearing Document No.787/1992 dated 06-04-1992 of SRO Tallarevu (pertainingo Ac. 0.65 cents in R.S.No.260 covered under Doc.No.3786/1992 Ac. 0.184 cents in R.S.No.213/2A/1 covered under Doc.No.787/1992, both situated at Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District to me forthwith by directing the respondents to pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining the documents pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. JAMI MADHAVI

Between:

1. I V R KRISHNAM RAJU, S/O JANAKIRAMARAJU, AGED 68 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O H.NO.8-2-293/82/A/1030/3, ROAD NO.51, JUBILLI HILLS,HYDERABAD.

2. SRI I SURYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O JANAKI RAMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O FLAT NO.203, LOTUS ARNET APARTMENTS, ASR NAGAR, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

RC,J

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE IDBI BANK LIMITED, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER AND REGIONAL HEAD, RETAIL BANKING GROUP, REGIONAL OFFICE, IDBI BANK LIMITED, AP, FIRST FLOOR, PYDAH CHAMBERS, VIP ROAD, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530003

2. THE BRANCH MANAGER / AUTHORISED OFFICER, IDBI BANK LIMITED, BHIMAVARAM BRANCH, DOOR NO. 22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

3. CENTRAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATION CBI, REP BY ITS INVESTIGATION OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM

pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not returning our original title deeds and not releasing the mortage of our documents vide document no. 1 of 1993 Tallarevu SRO dated 02-01-1993 Ac.02.85 cents in Sy.no 241/1, 2, 3, Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District, even after closure of the loan accounts, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19(1 Kg). 21 and 300- A of the Constitution of India, and contrary to the law declared by the Honble Apex Court and various Honble High Courts including this Honble Court, apart from the principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents to release the mortage and return the original title deeds by releasing the mortgage of vide document no. 1 of 1993 Tallarevu SRO dated 02-01-1993 pertaining to land admeasuring of Ac.02.85 cents in Sy.no 241/1, 2, 3, chollangi village, Tallarevu Mandal, E.G.District to the petitioners forthwith, and to pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining my documents and to pass

RC,J

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the mortage and return the original title deeds by releasing the mortgage of vide document no. 1 of 1993 Tallarevu SRO dated 02-01-1993 pertaining to land admeasuring of Ac.02.85 cents in Sy.no 241/1, 3, chollangi village, Tallarevu Mandal, E.G.District to the petitioners forthwith, and to pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining my documents; pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. JAMI MADHAVI

Between:

1. INDUKURI VENKATA SATYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O LATE JANAKIRAMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS, R/O G-2, BLOCK E-4, DEVI NIVAS, MADHURA NAGAR, NEAR VELLANKI FOODS, HYDERABAD - 500038, TELANGANA STATE. ...PETITIONER AND

1. THE IDBI BANK LIMITED, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER AND REGIONAL HEAD, RETAIL BANKING GROUP, REGIONAL OFFICE, IDBI BANK LIMITED, AP, FIRST FLOOR, PYDAH CHAMBERS, VIP ROAD, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530003.

RC,J

2. THE BRANCH MANAGER / AUTHORISED OFFICER, IDBI BANK LIMITED, BHIMAVARAM BRANCH, DOOR NO. 22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

3. CENTRAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATING OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM.

pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents, particularly respondent Nos.1 and 2, in not releasing the mortgage and not returning my original title deed vide sale deed bearing Document No. 1263/2010 dated 26-03-2010 of SRO, Maheswaram, RR District, Telangana, even after issuance of No Dues Certificate dated 29-12- 2020, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and contrary to the law declared by the Honble Apex Court and various Honble High Courts including this Honble Court, apart from the principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents to relase the mortgage and return the original title deed sale deed bearing Document No. 1263/2010 dated 26-03-2010 of SRO, Maheswaram, RR District Telangana, even after issuance of No Dues Certificate dated 29-12-2020 to me forthwith and to pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining my documents and to pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the mortgage and return the original title deed sale deed bearing Document No. 1263/2010 dated 26-03- 2010 of SRO, Maheswaram, RR District, Telangana, to me forthwith by directing the respondents to pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining the documents pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass

RC,J

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. JAMI MADHAVI

Between:

1. I V R KRISHNAM RAJU, S/O JANAKIRAMARAJU, AGED 68 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O H.NO.8-2-293/82/A/1030/3, ROAD NO.51, JUBILLI HILLS,HYDERABAD. 2.

2. SRI I SURYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O JANAKI RAMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O FLAT NO.203, LOTUS ARNET APARTMENTS, ASR NAGAR, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE IDBI BANK LIMITED, AS THE IDBI BANK LIMITED REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER REGIONAL HEAD, RETAIL BANKING GROUP, REGIONAL OFFICE, IDBI BANK LIMITED, AP, FIRST FLOOR, PYDAH CHAMBERS,

VIP ROAD, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530003. 2.

2. THE BRANCH MANAGER / AUTHORISED OFFICER IDBI BANK LIMITED, BHIMAVARAM BRANCH, DOOR NO. 22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3.

3. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION CBI, REP.BY ITS INVESTIGATION OFFICER, VISAKHAPATHAM

RC,J

pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not returning our original title deeds and not releasing the mortage of our documents vide doc.no.788/1992 dated 06-04-1992, Doc.No.3787/1992 dated 24-08- 1992, of SRO Tallarevu) pertaining to our lands in R.S.No.213/2A/1, 260 Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District, even after closure of the loan accounts, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and contrary to the law declared by the Honble Apex Court and various Honble High Courts including this Honble Court, apart from the principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents to return the original title deeds by releasing the mortgage of (Doc.No.788/1992 dated 06-04-1992, Doc.No.3787/1992 dated 24-08- 1992, of SRO Tallarevu) pertaining to our lands in R.S.No.213/2A/1, 260 Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District, to the petitioners forthwith, and to pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining my documents and to pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the mortgage and return the original title deeds (Doc.No.788/1992 dated 06-04- 1992, Doc.No.3787/1992 dated 24-08- 1992, of SRO Tallarevu) pertaining to our lands in R.S.No.213/2A/1,260 Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District, to the petitioners forthwith, and to pay appropriate monetary compensation for illegally retaining my documents; pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. JAMI MADHAVI

RC,J

Between:

1. SRI I.P.R. MOHAN RAJU,, S/O JANAKIRAMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS, R/O VILLA NO.33, JAYABHERI TEMPLE TREE, NANAKRAMGUDA, HYDERABAD.

2. SRI I V R KRISHNAM RAJU, S/O JANAKIRAMARAJU, AGED 68 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O H.NO.8-2-293/82/A/1030/3, ROAD NO.51, JUBILLI HILLS,HYDERABAD.

3. SRI I SURYANARAYANA RAJU,, S/O JANAKI RAMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O FLAT NO.203, LOTUS ARNET APARTMENTS, ASR NAGAR, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE IDBI BANK LIMITED, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER AND REGIONAL HEAD, RETAIL BANKING GROUP, REGIONAL OFFICE, IDBI BANK LIMITED, AP, FIRST FLOOR, PYDAH CHAMBERS, VIP ROAD, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530003.

2. THE BRANCH MANAGER / AUTHORISED OFFICER, IDBI BANK LIMITED, BHIMAVARAM BRANCH, DOOR NO. 22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

3. CENTRAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATING OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM

pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents, particularly respondent Nos.1 and 2, in not return the original title deed vide RC,J

Doc. No. 2 of 1993 dated 02-01-1993 which is mortagaged in favour of Respondents no. 1 and 2 for the property situated at Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District, even after closure of the loan accounts, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and contrary to the law declared by the Honble Apex Court and various Honble High Courts including this Honble Court, apart from the principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to relase the mortgage and return the original title deed vide Doc. No. 2 of 1993 dated 02-01-1993 are situated at Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District, and to pass such in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to relase the mortgage and return the original title deed vide Doc. No. 2 of 1993 dated 02-01-1993 are situated at Chollangi Village, Tallarevu Mandal, East Godavari District; pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. JAMI MADHAVI

Between:

1. M TEJASWI GAYATRI, D/O. VENKATA SUBBA RAJU, AGED ABOUT YEARS, A-32 HILL RIDGE VILLAS, NATIONAL GAMES VILLAGE IVRCL GACHIBOWLI, HYDERABAD- TELANGANA-500032 ...PETITIONER AND

RC,J

1. IDBI BANK LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY D.NO.22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, ANDHRA PRADESH- 534201.

2. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATION OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 530017

pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus a) Declare the action of Respondent No.l in not releasing the original documents/title deeds of the petitioners property described in Schedule A and B after issuing No Dues Letters as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of the Petitioner's rights under Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. b) Direct the Respondent No.l and2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the petitioners property as described in the Schedule by the Petitioners. and to pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.l and 2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the petitioners pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

RC,J

Between:

1. CHINTALAPATI KARTHIK VARMA, S/O. CHINTALAPATI SATYANARAYANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, A-32 HILL RIDGE VILLAS, NATIONAL GAMES VILLAGE IVRCL GACHIBOWLI, HYDERABAD- TELANGANA-500032 ...PETITIONER AND

1. IDBI BANK LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY D.NO.22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, ANDHRA PRADESH- 534201.

2. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATION OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT-530017

pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus. a) Declare the action of Respondent No.l in not releasing the original documents/title deeds of the petitioner's property as described in Schedule A and B after issuing No Dues Letters as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of the Petitioner's rights under Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. b) Direct the Respondent No.1 and 2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the petitioner's property as described in the Schedule by the Petitioners. and to pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.1 & 2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the petitioners pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass RC,J

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

Between:

1. M V K BANGARU RAJU, S/O. M.ANJANEYA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, FLAT NO.105, A.S.RAJU NAGAR,

KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD - 500017. ...PETITIONER AND

1. IDBI BANK LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY. D.NO.22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, ANDHRA PRADESH- 534201.

2. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATION OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT-530017

pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus a) Declare the action of Respondent No.1 in not releasing the original documents/title deeds of the petitioner's property as described in Schedule A and B after issuing No Dues Letters as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of the Petitioner's rights under Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. b) Direct the Respondent No.1 and 2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the petitioner's property as described in the Schedule by the Petitioners. and to pass RC,J

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.1 & 2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the petitioners pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

Between:

1. CHINTALAPATI RAVINDRA VARMA,, S/O. CHINTALAPATI SATYANARAYANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, A-32 HILL RIDGE VILLAS, NATIONAL GAMES VILLAGE IVRCL GACHIBOWLI, HYDERABAD- TELANGANA-500032 ...PETITIONER AND

1. IDBI BANK LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY D.NO.22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, ANDHRA PRADESH- 534201.

2. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATION OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT-530017

RC,J

pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus a)Declare the action of Respondent No.l in not releasing the original documents/title deeds of the petitioner's property as described in Schedule A after issuing No Dues Letters as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of the Petitioner's rights under Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. b)Direct the Respondent No.1 and 2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the petitioner's property as described in the Schedule by the Petitioners.

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.l & 2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the petitioners pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

Between:

1. M R KRISHNA GAYATHRI, D/O.M.V.SUBBA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O.VILLA NO.A-32, HILL RIDGE VILLAS, GACHIBOWLI, HYDERABAD- 500032. ...PETITIONER AND

1. IDBI BANK LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY D.NO.22-11-9, BESIDE LONDON HOSPITAL, SUNDAY

RC,J

MARKET, BHIMAVARAM, ANDHRA PRADESH- 534201.

2. CH VENKATA LAKSHMI PADMAVATI, W/O.SATYANARAYANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O.VILLA NO.A-32, HILL RIDGE VILLAS, GACHIBOWLI, HYDERABAD- 500032.

3. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS INVESTIGATION OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT-530017

pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus (a) Declare the action of Respondent No.l in not releasing the original documents/title deeds of the petitioners property as described in Schedule A and B after issuing No Dues Letters as being arbitrary, iliegal and violative of the Petitioners s rights under Article 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India. (b) Direct the Respondent No.l and 2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the petitioners property as described in the Schedule by the Petitioners. and to pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.l and 2 to immediately release the original documents/title deeds of the Petitioners property as described in Schedule by the petitioners pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. VIMAL VARMA VASI REDDY

RC,J

COMMON ORDER

These Writ Petitions have been filed questioning the action of the respondent Banks in not returning the original title deeds deposited with the banks for obtaining loans by creation of mortgage even after completely discharging the loan amount.

2. Heard Sri Dammalapati Srinivas, learned senior counsel, representing the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri M.Ravi Kumar, learned Standing counsel for respondent banks and Sri P.S.P.Suresh Kumar, learned Special Public Prosecutor for Central Bureau of Investigation.

3. Sri Dammalapati Srinivas, learned senior counsel, while reiterating the contents of the writ affidavits would contend that the petitioners obtained loans by mortgaging their immovable property by way of deposit of their original title deeds and even after the loan amount was discharged and loan accounts were closed the respondent bank did neither returned the original title deeds nor released the mortgages by executing deed of release of mortgage on the ground that the original title documents were seized by the Central Bureau of Investigation in connection with crime. He would further contend that the petitioners are no way connected with the crime and it is the duty and responsibility of the respondent bank to take steps for getting back the original title deeds by initiating appropriate proceedings before the RC,J

competent Forum where the documents are lying and return them to the petitioners. Accordingly, prayed to allow the writ petitions.

4. Sri M.Ravi Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for respondent bank, submitted that the respondent bank is ready and willing to initiate appropriate proceedings for getting back the original title deeds with the assistance of the parties and in fact the respondent bank had filed application for release of documents relating to some customer and the concerned Criminal Court allowed the said petition and ordered for release of the document.

5. On the other hand Sri P.S.P.Suresh Kumar, learned Special Public Prosecutor for Central Bureau of Investigation, submitted that some of the petitioners have some role in the crime.

6. At this juncture, learned Senior Counsel prayed this Court to dispose of the writ petitions by recording the contentions advanced by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent bank with a direction to the respondent bank for filing appropriate applications before the concerned Court for release of the documents and the petitioners would cooperate with the bank for initiation and prosecution of the said applications.

7. Taking into consideration the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without going into merits or demerits of the matter RC,J

as to whether any of the petitioners have any connection with the crime, is inclined to dispose of the writ petitions, directing the respondent bank to take steps by filing appropriate applications/petitions before the concerned Court for release of the original title deeds with a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. On such, the concerned court shall dispose of the application on merits in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

8. Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 9th July, 2026

RR Whether the order is :   Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No   Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No